Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 611, 2025
2nd International Symposium on Environmental and Energy Policy (ISEEP 2024)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 11
Section Environmental and Energy Policy Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561103004
Published online 24 January 2025
  1. K. min Zhang and Z. guo Wen, “Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1249–1261, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Samnuzulsari, M. Elsera, Y. D. Artini, H. Susanto, W. E. Yudiatmaja, and D. S. Utari, “Undertaking climate change risk reduction: A case study of Green Siak in Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1148, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1148/1/012043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Van Noordwijk et al., “Payments for environmental services: Evolution toward efficient and fair incentives for multifunctional landscapes,” Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., vol. 37, pp. 389–420, 2012, doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-042511-150526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Kumar and S. Managi, “Compensation for environmental services and intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of India,” Ecol. Econ., vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 3052–3059, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Busch et al., “A global review of ecological fiscal transfers,” Nat. Sustain., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 756–765, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Tallis, P. Kareiva, M. Marvier, and A. Chang, “An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 105, no. 28, pp. 9457–9464, 2008, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705797105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. F. L. L. de Paulo and P. J. Sobral Camões, “The adoption of ecological fiscal transfers: An empirical analysis,” Land use policy, vol. 88, no. September, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. D. Watts, L. Tacconi, S. Irawan, and A. H. Wijaya, “Village transfers for the environment: Lessons from community-based development programs and the village fund,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 108, no. January, p. 101863, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Anto, F. A. Mappasere, and D. Chandra, “Impacts and Challenges of Implementing Ecological Fiscal Transfers : A Systematic Literature Review of Indonesia ’ s Policies,” J. Public Policy, vol. 3, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. I. Kabullah, “The innovation of ecological fiscal transfers policy at Siak Regency,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1041, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1041/1/012040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Lee et al., “Reviewing the material and metal security of low-carbon energy transitions,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 124, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109789. [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Ring, “Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil,” Land use policy, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 485–497, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. A. T. Le, K. Vodden, J. Wu, R. Bullock, and G. Sabau, “Payments for ecosystem services programs: A global review of contributions towards sustainability,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 1, p. e22361, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22361. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Wahyudi, “Strategy of Institutional Reinforecement to Overcome Regional Disparities in Siak Regency,” Int. Conf. Reg. …, pp. 142–154, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://proceedings.undip.ac.id/index.php/icrd/article/view/190%0A http://proceedings.undip.ac.id/index.php/icrd/article/viewFile/190/50 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Nasir, “Protecting Forested Areas in Non-Forest Zone through The Ecological Fiscal Transfer Scheme in Indonesia: A case study from Kutai Timur district,” For. Soc., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 399–421, 2022, doi: 10.24259/fs.v6i1.19193. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Firdaus, Mardiana, S. Andrikasmi, and T. Handoko, “Siak green policy in environmental political flows in Indonesia: Political policy perspectives, gender mainstreaming and public participation,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 506, pp. 10–16, 2024, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202450602007. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Verde Selva, N. Pauli, M. Kiatkoski Kim, and J. Clifton, “Can environmental compensation contribute to socially equitable conservation? The case of an ecological fiscal transfer in the Brazilian Atlantic forest,” Local Environ., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 931–948, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1663800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. G. V. Selva, N. Pauli, J. Clifton, and M. K. Kim, “A framework for analysing ecological fiscal transfers: Case studies from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest,” J. Lat. Am. Stud., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 269–296, 2021, doi: 10.1017/S0022216X21000018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. A. Moallemi et al., “Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Requires Transdisciplinary Innovation at the Local Scale,” One Earth, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 300–313, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Mumbunan, I. Ring, and T. Lenk, “Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia,” Indonesia, 06, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. L. C. Rodrigues, “Ecological Fiscal Transfer ( EFT ) in Portugal,” Environ. Manag., p. 4, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/2fa8b43b-13cc-4878-a670ced2e31b4caf/PT Ecological Fiscal Transfer final.pdf?v=63680923242 [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Syahrizal and M. S. Jailani, “Jenis-Jenis Penelitian Dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif,” J. QOSIM J. Pendidik. Sos. Hum., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2023, doi: 10.61104/jq.v1i1.49. [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Spilimbergo, S. Symansky, O. Blanchard, and C. Cottarelli, “Fiscal Policy for the Crisis Prepared by the Fiscal Affairs and Research Departments,” 2008. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1339442 [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Clark, J. Reed, and T. Sunderland, “Bridging funding gaps for climate and sustainable development: Pitfalls, progress and potential of private finance,” Land use policy, vol. 71, no. December 2017, pp. 335–346, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Kirchherr, N. H. N. Yang, F. Schulze-Spüntrup, M. J. Heerink, and K. Hartley, “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy (Revisited): An Analysis of 221 Definitions,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 194, no. September 2022, p. 107001, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. K. M. A. Chan et al., “Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability,” People Nat., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 693–717, 2020, doi: 10.1002/pan3.10124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. N. F. Shayan, N. Mohabbati-Kalejahi, S. Alavi, and M. A. Zahed, “Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR),” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Salvador and D. Sancho, “The role of local government in the drive for sustainable development public policies. An analytical framework based on institutional capacities,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13115978. [Google Scholar]
  29. H. A. M. Hamdan, P. H. Andersen, and L. de Boer, “Stakeholder collaboration in sustainable neighborhood projects—A review and research agenda,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 68, no. February, p. 102776, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Reed, J. Barlow, R. Carmenta, J. van Vianen, and T. Sunderland, “Engaging multiple stakeholders to reconcile climate, conservation and development objectives in tropical landscapes,” Biol. Conserv., vol. 238, no. August, p. 108229, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. P. W. Titisari et al., “The potential of mangrove as a food source in Riau,” Futur. Food J. Food, Agric. Soc., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2023, doi: 10.17170/kobra202307218420. [Google Scholar]
  32. N. Seddon, A. Chausson, P. Berry, C. A. J. Girardin, A. Smith, and B. Turner, “Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 375, no. 1794, 2020, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0120. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Geissdoerfer, D. Vladimirova, and S. Evans, “Sustainable business model innovation: A review,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 198, pp. 401–416, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.