Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 618, 2025
6th International Symposium on Architecture Research Frontiers and Ecological Environment (ARFEE 2024)
Article Number 03013
Number of page(s) 5
Section Ecological Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561803013
Published online 27 February 2025
  1. Jasmy, A. J., Ismail, H., & Aljneibi, N. (2024) A novel approach to sustainable behavior enhancement through AI-driven carbon footprint assessment and real-time analytics. Discov Sustain., 5: 476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Piao, X., & Managi, S.(2023) Household energy-saving behavior, its consumption, and life satisfaction in 37 countries. Sci. Rep., 13: 1382-13 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajibade, I., & Boateng, G. O. (2021) Predicting why people engage in sustainable behaviors in Portland Oregon: The role of environmental self-identity, personal norm, and socio-demographics. J. Environ. Manage., 289: 112538 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Karlin, B., Zinger, J. F., & Ford, R. (2015) The effects of feedback on energy conservation: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull., 141: 1205-1227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016) The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy. Res. Soc. Sci., 22: 107-114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Filimonau, V., Coşkun, A., Yetkin Özbük, R. M., & Ermolaev, V. A. (2023) Like grandmother, like mother, like daughter? Intergenerational influence on consumer intention to reduce food waste. J. Cleaner Prod., 416: 137920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Babaei, A. A., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Teymouri, P., Ahmadi, K., & Rafiee, M. (2015) Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 102: 94-100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang, W., Liu, W., Viña, A., Tuanmu, M., He, G., Dietz, T., & Liu, J. (2013) Nonlinear effects of group size on collective action and resource outcomes. PNAS, 110: 10916-10921. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013a) The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol., 34: 55-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang, X., Van der Werff, E., Bouman, T., Harder, M. K., & Steg, L. (2021) I am vs. we are: How biospheric values and environmental identity of individuals and groups can influence pro-environmental behaviour. Front. Psychol., 12: 618956-618956. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environ. Behav., 25: 322-348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Balundė, A., & Perlaviciute, G. (2023) Are we on the same page? Exploring the relationships between environmental values, self-identity, personal norms and behavior in parent-adolescent dyads. J. Environ. Psychol., 92: 102157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014b) Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. J. Environ. Psychol., 40: 273-282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004) Cross‐national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Soc. Sci. Q., 85: 677-694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bem, D. J. (1972) Self-perception theory. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 6: 1-62 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000) The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Soc Psychol Q, 63: 284–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lacasse, K. (2016) Don't be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label. J. Environ. Psychol., 48: 149-158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hitlin, S. S. (2003) Values as the core of personal identity: a sociological integration of the self. The University of Wisconsin-Madison. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fischer, R. (2017) From Values to Behavior and from Behavior to Values. In: Roccas, S., Sagiv, L. (eds) Values and Behavior. Springer, Cham. pp. 219-235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008) A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci, 9: 545-556. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Verplanken, B., & Sui, J. (2019) Habit and identity: Behavioral, cognitive, affective, and motivational facets of an integrated self. Front. Psychol., 10: 1504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jia, F., & Yu, H. (2021) Action, communication, and engagement: How parents “ACE” children's sustainable behaviours. J. Environ. Psychol., 74: 101575. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayes, A. F. (2022) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications, New York. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., & Abrahamse, W. (2014) Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour. Contemp. Soc. Sci., 9: 374-392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.