EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 621 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 621 (2025) 03021 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 621, 2025
Second International Conference on Green Energy, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technologies 2024 (ICGEST 2024)
Article Number 03021
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Technology for Environmental Protection
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202562103021
Published online 19 March 2025
  1. N. Panackal, D. Singh, A. Sharma, Developing a conceptual framework on ecopreneurs and sustainability using ISM and MICMAC methodology (2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Singh, V.S. Pradhan, Y.B. Patil, Modeling drivers and barriers of climate change mitigation strategies in Indian iron and steel industry: A TISM-based approach, Manag. Environ. Qual. 34, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2023-0097 [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Cohen, H. Blanco, N.K. Dubash, S. Dukkipati, R. Khosla, S. Scrieciu, T.J. Stewart, M. Torres-Gunfaus, Multi-criteria decision analysis in policy-making for climate mitigation and development, Clim. Dev. 11, 212-222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1445612 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.K. Singh, V.P. Kumar, Establishing the relationship between the strategic factors influencing blockchain technology deployment for achieving SDG and ESG objectives during infrastructure development: An ISM-MICMAC approach, Smart Sustain. Built Environ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-12-2023-0405 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Munasinghe, Addressing sustainable development and climate change together using sustainomics, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Clim. Change 2 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.86 [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Mannan, S. Khurana, A. Haleem, Modeling of critical factors for integrating sustainability with innovation for Indian small- and medium-scale manufacturing enterprises: An ISM and MICMAC approach, Cogent Bus. Manag. 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1140318 [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Beloor, T.S. Nanjundeswaraswamy, D.R. Swamy, S. Aishwarya, N. Bharath Gowda, Modeling facilitators of sustainable manufacturing practices – An integrated Pareto, ISM and MICMAC approach, Mater. Today: Proc. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.227 [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Ben Ruben, S. Vinodh, P. Asokan, ISM and fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of Lean Six Sigma barriers with environmental considerations, Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 9, 00-00 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0071 [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Harikannan, S. Vinodh, A. Gurumurthy, Sustainable industry 4.0 – An exploratory study for uncovering the drivers for integration, J. Model. Manag. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-11-2019-0269 [Google Scholar]
  10. B.B. Gardas, R.D. Raut, B.E. Narkhede, Identifying critical success factors to facilitate reusable plastic packaging towards sustainable supply chain management, J. Environ. Manag. 236, 81-92 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.113 [Google Scholar]
  11. J.A. Wiseman, L. Williamson, J. Fritze, Community engagement and climate change: Learning from recent Australian experience, Int. J. Clim. Change Strat. Manag. 2, 134-147 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691011040399 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Boyle, M. Galvin, A. Revez, A. Deane, B. Ó Gallachóir, G. Mullally, Flexibility & structure: Community engagement on climate action & large infrastructure delivery, Energy Policy (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113050 [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Edizel-Tasci, G. Evans, Community engagement in climate change policy: The case of Three Mills, East London, in Governance of Climate Responsive Cities (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_5 [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Lal, J.A. Delgado, P.M. Groffman, N. Millar, C.J. Dell, A. Rotz, Y.N. Millar, Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change, J. Soil Water Conserv. 66, 276-285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.276 [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Kehagia, Climate change mitigation measures and road transport: A review (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. M.H. Smith, P. Stasinopoulos, A.R. Pears, E. Ahuja, Transport, in Transitioning to a Prosperous, Resilient and Carbon-Free Economy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316389553.020 [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Locatelli, C.P. Catterall, P. Imbach, C. Kumar, R.D. Lasco, E. Marín-Spiotta, B. Mercer, J.S. Powers, N.B. Schwartz, M. Uriarte, Tropical reforestation and climate change: Beyond carbon, Restor. Ecol. 23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12209 [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Jing, Reforestation is not a mitigation of climate change in all situations – A literature review, Asian J. Environ. Ecol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2019/v10i230113 [Google Scholar]
  19. R.K. Snow, M. Snow, The ecology and economy of forests, Int. J. Educ. 2 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. M.K. Tripathi, H. Kumar, P.K. Tyagi, Climate change mitigation potential of forestry sector for sustainability of agro-ecosystem: A review, Curr. World Environ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.12944/cwe.18.3.02 [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Lal, J.A. Delgado, P.M. Groffman, N. Millar, C.J. Dell, A. Rotz, Y.N. Millar, Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change, J. Soil Water Conserv. 66, 276-285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.276 [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Branca, L. Lipper, N. McCarthy, M.C. Jolejole, Food security, climate change, and sustainable land management. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 635-650 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0133-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. W.N. Digitemie, I.O. Ekemezie, Assessing the role of carbon pricing in global climate change mitigation strategies, Magna Scientia Adv. Res. Rev. (2024). https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0040 [Google Scholar]
  24. Warfield, J.G., Societal systems: Planning, policy and complexity (Wiley, New York, 1976). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.