Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 642, 2025
5th European Conference on Unsaturated Soils and Biotechnology applied to Geotechnical Engineering (EUNSAT2025 + BGE)
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 6
Section BGE - Hydromechanical Effects of Roots and Vegetation on Geotechnical Structures
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564206004
Published online 14 August 2025
  1. A. Fraccica, E.E. Romero Morales, T. Fourcaud. Large cell triaxial tests of a partially saturated soil with vegetation. In E3S Web of Conferences, 382, 05005. EDP Sciences (2023). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Fraccica, E. Romero, T. Fourcaud. Tensile strength of a compacted vegetated soil: Laboratory results and reinforcement interpretation. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 30, 100303 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  3. A.A. Karimzadeh, A. K. Leung, S. Hosseinpour, Z. Wu, P. Fardad Amini. Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of root-reinforced sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 99 (999), 1915-1927. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0626. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Lepri, A. Fraccica V. Tagarelli, J. Vaunat, M. Cecconi. Some remarks on the possible effects of vegetation cutting on the triggering of debris flows in Central Italy. Proc. of the 9th International Symposium for Geotechnical Safety and Risk (ISGSR 2025), Oslo, August 2025, in print. (2025). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Stokes, C. Atger, A. G. Bengough, T. Fourcaud, R. C. Sidle. Desirable plant root traits for protecting natural and engineered slopes against landslides. Plant and soil, 324, 1-30 (2009). cutting as a predisposing factor in slope instability around the source area of debris flow. Soil and roots physical properties revealed a marked in-situ natural heterogeneity, increasing the complexity of comparisons of the results obtained in the area subjected to vegetation cutting and the control area. An average trend of soil water retention has been determined through laboratory and in-situ measurements. Further [Google Scholar]
  6. G. B. Bischetti, E. A. Chiaradia, T. Epis, E. Morlotti. Root cohesion of forest species in the Italian Alps. Plant and soil, 324, 71-89 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. T. Van Genuchten. A closed‐form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44(5), 892-898 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Kamiya K. T.Uno T. (2000) Grain size and void diameter distributions of sands. In: Unsaturated soils for Asia. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Unsaturated Soils, UNSAT-ASIA 2000, Balkema, 18-19 May, 2000, Singapore, 399-404. [Google Scholar]
  9. G. J. Meijer, A. G. Bengough, J. A. Knappett.K. W. Loades, B. C. Nicoll. In situ measurement of root- reinforcement using the corkscrew extraction method, Can. Geotech. J., 55 (10), 1372–1390. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0344 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. T.H. Wu Root reinforcement of soil: review of analytical models, test results, and applications to design. Can Geotech J 50, 259–274 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Mao. Root reinforcement models: classification, criticism and perspectives. Plant Soil 472, 17–28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05231-1 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. L. Öberg, G. Sällfors. Determination of shear strength parameters of unsaturated silts and sands based on the water retention curve. Geotech. Test J. 20(1), 40–48. (1997) https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11419J. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.