Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 643, 2025
2025 7th International Conference on Environmental Sciences and Renewable Energy (ESRE 2025)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Waste Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564301001
Published online 29 August 2025
  1. Tello, L., Jave, J., & Guerrero, J. (2018). Análisis de cuantificación de plomo en suelos de parques recreacionales de la ciudad de lima perú. Ecología Aplicada, 17(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v17i1.1168 [Google Scholar]
  2. Díaz, N. D. P. D. and Castro, J. B. G. (2023). Actividades económicas y calidad del agua del río moche, puente constancia y puente concón. UCV Hacer, 11(4), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.18050/revucvhacer.v11n4a5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Thomas, R. Q., Figueiredo, R., Daneshmand, V., Bookout, B. J., Puckett, L. K., & Carey, C. C. (2020). A near-term iterative forecasting system successfully predicts reservoir hydrodynamics and partitions uncertainty in real time.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.22.915538 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, S., Fang, G., Huang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Water quality prediction model of a water diversion project based on the improved artificial bee colony–backpropagation neural network. Water, 10(6), 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060806 [Google Scholar]
  5. Shao, D., Nong, X., Tan, X., Chen, S., Xu, B., & Hu, N. (2018). Daily water quality forecast of the south-to-north water diversion project of china based on the cuckoo search-back propagation neural network. Water, 10(10), 1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101471 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong, Y., Wang, J., Niu, X., & Zeng, B. (2022). Combined water quality forecasting system based on multiobjective optimization and improved data decomposition integration strategy. Journal of Forecasting, 42(2), 260–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2905 [Google Scholar]
  7. Iwasaki, Y., Suemori, T., & Kobayashi, Y. (2024). Predicting macroinvertebrate average score per taxon (aspt) at water quality monitoring sites in japanese rivers.. https://doi.org/10.32942/x2jw3p [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoss, F. and Fischbeck, P. S. (2015). Performance and robustness of probabilistic river forecasts computed with quantile regression based on multiple independent variables. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19(9), 3969–3990. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3969-2015 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, F. and Guo, S. (2020). Advances in hydrologic forecasts and water resources management. Water, 12(6), 1819. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061819 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bui, L. T., Tran, D. L. T. H., & Nguyen, D. P. (2024). Prediction of the river water environment carrying capacity using lstm networks. Water Supply, 24(7), 2518–2533. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.138 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu, C., Wu, Q., Li, H., Jian, S., Li, N., & Lou, Z. (2018). Deep learning with a long short-term memory networks approach for rainfall-runoff simulation. Water, 10(11), 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111543 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yao, C., Ye, J., He, Z., Bastola, S., Zhang, K., & Li, Z. (2019). Evaluation of flood prediction capability of the distributed grid‐xinanjiang model driven by weather research and forecasting precipitation. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12544 [Google Scholar]
  13. Givati, A., Housh, M., Levi, Y., Paz, D., Carmona, I., & Becker, E. (2017). The advantage of using international multimodel ensemble for seasonal precipitation forecast over israel. Advances in Meteorology, 2017, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9204081 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lintern, A., Webb, J. A., Ryu, D., Liu, S., Bende‐Michl, U., Waters, D., … & Western, A. W. (2017). Key factors influencing differences in stream water quality across space. WIREs Water, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1260 [Google Scholar]
  15. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. (2025). Environmental Statistics. https://www.inei.gob.pe/biblioteca-virtual/boletines/estadisticas-ambientales/2020/1/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.