EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 644 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 644 (2025) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 644, 2025
EUROGEO 8 - 8th European Conference on Geosynthetics
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 10
Section Testing and Quality
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564402006
Published online 01 September 2025
  1. J.K. Mitchell, J.G. Zornberg, Reinforced soil structures with poorly draining backfills. Part II: Case histories and applications. Geosynth. Int. 2(1), 265–307 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Collios, P. Delmas, J.-P. Gourc, J.-P. Giroud, Experiments on soil reinforcement with geotextiles, in Proceedings of The Use of Geotextiles for Soil Improvement, ASCE National Convention, Portland, U.S.A., (1980), 53–73 [Google Scholar]
  3. S.K. Saxena, J.S. Budiman, Interface response of geotextiles, in Proceedings of the XIth International Conference on Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, U.S.A., (1985), Vol. 3, 1801–1804 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.B. Fourie, K.J. Fabian, Laboratory determination of clay – geotextile interaction. Geotext. Geomembr. 6, 275–294 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Lafleur, M.S. Sall, A. Ducharme, Frictional characteristics of geotextiles with compacted lateritic gravels and clays, in Proceedings of the Geosynthetics ’87 conference, New Orleans, U.S.A., (1987), Vol. 1, 205–215 [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Makiuchi, T. Miyamori, Mobilization of soil–geofabric interface friction, in Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on Theory and Practice of Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, (1988), 129–134 [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Garbulewski, Direct shear and pullout frictional resistance at the geotextile – mud interface, in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes & Related Products, The Hague, (1990), Vol. 2, 737–742 [Google Scholar]
  8. R.C. Gomes, E.M. Palmeira, D. Vidal, Soil reinforcement interaction by in-soil tensile tests and direct shear tests, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes & Related Products, Singapore, (1994), Vol. 1, 395–400 [Google Scholar]
  9. G.A. Athanasopoulos, Results of direct shear tests on geotextile reinforced cohesive soil. Geotext. Geomembr. 14, 619–644 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Koutsourais, D. Sandri, R. Swan, Soil interaction characteristics of geotextiles and geogrids, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, U.S.A., (1998), Vol. 2, 739–744 [Google Scholar]
  11. L.A. Seraphim, M.J.A. Zagatto Penha, Shear strength in the interface between compacted fine grained soil and nonwoven geotextile, in Proceedings of the 2nd European Geosynthetics Conference, Bologna, Italy, (2000), Vol. 2, 865–867 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Abu-Farsakh, J. Coronel, M. Tao, Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 19(7), 540–549 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540) [Google Scholar]
  13. K.D. Eigenbrod, J.G. Locker, Determination of friction values for the design of side slopes lined or protected with geosynthetics. Can. Geotech. J. 24, 509–519 (1987) [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Hatami, D. Esmaili, Unsaturated soil–woven geotextile interface strength properties from small-scale pullout and interface tests. Geosynth. Int. 22(2), 161–172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.15.00002 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Söylemez, S. Arslan, Experimental investigation of influence of clay in soil on interface friction between geotextile and clayey soil. Arab J. Geosci. 13, 342 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05339-1 [Google Scholar]
  16. H.R. Razeghi, A. Ensani, Clayey sand soil interactions with geogrids and geotextiles using large-scale direct shear tests. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 9, 24 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-023-00443-0 [Google Scholar]
  17. ASTM D422, Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. R.M. Koerner, Designing with geosynthetics, 6th Edition (Xlibris Corporation, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. ASTM D5321, Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method, Vol. 04–13. Geosynthetics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2006) [Google Scholar]
  20. J.P. Giroud, J. Darrasse, R.C. Bachus, Hyperbolic expression for soil-geosynthetic or geosynthetic-geosynthetic interface shear strength. Geotext. Geomembr. 12, 275–286 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  21. T.D. Stark, A.R. Poeppel, Landfill liner interface strengths from torsional-ring-shear tests. J. Geotech. Eng. 120, 597–615 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  22. I.N. Markou, E.D. Evangelou, Shear resistance characteristics of soil–geomembrane interfaces. Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 4, 29 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-018-0146-6 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.