Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 644, 2025
EUROGEO 8 - 8th European Conference on Geosynthetics
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02007 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Testing and Quality | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202564402007 | |
| Published online | 01 September 2025 | |
- C. S. Vieira, P. M. Pereira, and M. D. L. Lopes, Recycled Construction and Demolition Wastes as filling material for geosynthetic reinforced structures. Interface properties, J. Clean. Prod., vol. 124, pp. 299–311 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.115 [Google Scholar]
- C. S. Vieira and P. M. Pereira, Interface shear properties of geosynthetics and construction and demolition waste from large-scale direct shear tests, Geosynth. Int., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 62–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00030 [Google Scholar]
- C. S. Vieira and P. M. Pereira, Resources, Conservation and Recycling Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications : A review,Resources, Conserv. Recycl., vol. 103, pp. 192–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.023 [Google Scholar]
- E. C. Santos, E. M. Palmeira, and R. J. Bathurst, Performance of two geosynthetic reinforced walls with recycled construction waste backfill and constructed on collapsible ground, Geosynth. Int., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 256–269 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00013. [Google Scholar]
- F. B. Ferreira, C. S. Vieira, M. L. Lopes, and D. M. Carlos, Experimental investigation on the pullout behaviour of geosynthetics embedded in a granite residual soil, Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1147–1180 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1090927. [Google Scholar]
- C. N. Liu, Y. H. Ho, and J. W. Huang, Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PETyarn geogrid interfaces, Geotext. Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 19–30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.002. [Google Scholar]
- G. Cardile, L. S. Calvarano, D. Gioffrè, and N. Moraci, Experimental evaluation of the pullout active length of different geogrids, 10th Int. Conf. Geosynth. ICG 2014, no. 1, (2014) [Google Scholar]
- E. M. Palmeira, Soil-geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis, Geotext. Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 368–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003. [Google Scholar]
- B. K. Karnamprabhakara, H. Chennarapu, and U. Balunaini, Modified Axial Pullout Resistance Factors of Geostrip and Metal Strip Reinforcements in Sand Considering Transverse Pull Effects, Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 3847–3858 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02485-7. [Google Scholar]
- C. S. Vieira and P. M. Pereira, Use of Mixed Construction and Demolition Recycled Materials in Geosynthetic Reinforced Embankments, Indian Geotech. J., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 279–292 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0254-6 [Google Scholar]
- J. Liu, J. Pan, Q. Liu, and Y. Xu, Experimental study on the interface characteristics of geogrid-reinforced gravelly soil based on pull-out tests, Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59297-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.