Legal Reasoning in the Era of Climate Change: Overcoming Challenges in Integrating Science into Judicial Decision-Making

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 650, 2025 The 10^th International Conference on Energy, Environment, and Information Systems (ICENIS 2025)


Article Number		02054
Number of page(s)		12
Section		Environment
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565002054
Published online		10 October 2025

K. Garg and G. G. Tumanishvili, “Legal Aspects and Implications of Climate Change,” Law & World, vol. 7, no. 17, pp. 100–120, 2021, doi: 10.36475/7.2.8. [Google Scholar]
L. Y. Sulistiawati, “Climate Change Related Litigation in Indonesia,” Communications Earth & Environment, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 522, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01684-1. [Google Scholar]
M. A. M. Farig, “Konsensus Epistemik Hakim: Fondasi Baru Keadilan Iklim di Indonesia,” Dandapala, Dandapala, July 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://dandapala.com/article/detail/konsensus-epistemik-hakim-fondasi-baru-keadila n-iklim-di-indonesia [Google Scholar]
M. A. M. Farig, “Keadilan Iklim di Ruang Sidang: Dari Netralitas Hukum ke Keberpihakan Ekologis,” Marinews (Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia), Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, July 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/keadilan-iklim-di-ruang-sidang-0oe [Google Scholar]
V. Karimi and E. Karamidehkordi, “Scientiﬁc Evolution of Climate Change Justice: A Bibliometric Review,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 10, p. 101073, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101073. [Google Scholar]
M. Burger, J. A. Wentz, and R. Horton, “The Law and Science of Climate Change Attribution,” Environmental Law Reporter, vol. 51, p. 10646, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/sabin_climate_change/32/ [Google Scholar]
A. O. Salau, “The Future of Climate Change Litigation in Pursuit of Environmental Sustainability in Africa: A Review of Nigeria’s 2021 Climate Change Act,” in Domestic and Regional Environmental Laws and Policies in Africa, Taylor & Francis, 2023, pp. 405–421. [Google Scholar]
S. N. Thiam and J. C. Page, “Overview of Climate Litigation,” Environmental Law Institute, Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.eli.org/sites/default/ﬁles/ﬁles-pdf/Overview%20of%20Climate%20Litig ation_FINAL%20WORD_formatted.pdf [Google Scholar]
S. Rahardjo, Penegakan hukum progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2010. [Google Scholar]
L. J. van Apeldoorn, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1978. [Google Scholar]
T. L. Indreswari, A. D. Lumbanraja, and A. Natalis, “Enhancing Environmental Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrating Climate Justice into Judicial Legal Reasoning,” Pakistan Journal of Life & Social Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1836–1844, 2024, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.00131. [Google Scholar]
T. Baxter, “Urgenda-Style Climate Litigation Has Promise in Australia,” Australian Environment Review, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 70–75, June 2017, doi: 10.3316/agispt.20172542. [Google Scholar]
R. Nelson, “Breaking Backs and Boiling Frogs: Warnings from a Dialogue Between Federal Water Law and Environmental Law,” University of New South Wales Law Journal, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1179–1214, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3316/ielapa.784919618602600. [Google Scholar]
K. Roach, “Judicial Remedies for Climate Change,” Journal of Law & Equality, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 105–150, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/utjle/article/view/37647 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.