EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 657 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 657 (2025) 08001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 657, 2025
2nd International Conference on Sustainability and Technology in Climate Change (2nd IC-STCC 2025)
Article Number 08001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Linguistics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565708001
Published online 03 November 2025
  1. J.C. Gaillard and Jessica Mercer, From knowledge to action: Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction, Prog. Hum. Geogr. 37, 93–114 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Erman, S. A. De Vries Robbe, S. F. Thies, K. Kabir, and M. Maruo, Gender dimensions of disaster risk and resilience: Existing evidence, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Lim, “From Activist Media to Algorithmic Politics, 25–44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367422080-3. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Gao, T. Yang, Y. Xu, N. Mou, X. Wang, and H. Huang, Enhancing Disaster Situation Awareness Through Multimodal Social Media Data: Evidence from Typhoon Haikui, Appl. Sci. 15, 465 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15010465. [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Hemachandra, D. Amaratunga, and R. Haigh, Role of women in disaster risk governance, Proce. Eng. 212, 1187–1194 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.153. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. C. Gaillard, A. Gorman-Murray, and M. Fordham, Sexual and gender minorities in disaster, Gender, Place Cult. 24, 18–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2016.1263438. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Tagliacozzo and I. Di Tullio, Gender equality plans (GEPs) as a framework to devise gender equality measures for disaster research, Int. J. Disas. Ris. Reduct. 60, 102294 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102294. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Machin and A. Mayr, How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320: SAGE Publications, Inc. (2023). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036212933. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Acanga, B. Matovu, V. Murale, and S. Arlikatti, Gender perspectives in disaster response: An evidence-based review, Prog. Disas. Sci. 26, 100416 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100416. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Puspita Kurniawati, Gender Equality That Goes Unnoticed: A Critical Study Of Indonesian Law On Disaster Management (2023). [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Enarson and P. G. Chakrabarti, Women, Gender and Disaster: Global Issues and Initiatives. (2009). https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108078. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Bradshaw and M. Fordham, Women, Girls and Disasters, Dfid, 1–54 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Kress and T. van Leeuwen, The Semiotic Landscape, 344–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060994-32. [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Jewitt, Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies, 250–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282229.n18. [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Kress and T. van Leeuwen, Reading Images. (Routledge, London 2021). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Bradshaw, Gender, Development and Disasters. (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548232. [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Anantasari and S. Davies, Gender-Sensitive Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia, Int. Consult. Rep. 11, 24 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. A. R. Tickamyer and S. Kusujiarti, Riskscapes of gender, disaster and climate change in Indonesia, Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 13, 233–251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa006. [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Abao et al., Women inNatural Disasters:Indicative Findings in UnravelingGender in Institutional Responses, 1–133 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Wisner, Five Years Beyond Sendai Can We Get Beyond Frameworks?, Int. J. Disas. Ris. Sci. 11, 239–249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00263-0. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.