EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 658 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 658 (2025) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 658, 2025
Third International Conference of Applied Industrial Engineering: Intelligent Models and Data Engineering (CIIA 2025)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 15
Section Industrial Optimization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565801006
Published online 13 November 2025
  1. Pesce, D., & Neirotti, P. (2023). The impact of IT–business strategic alignment on firm performance: The evolving role of IT in industries. Information & Management, 60(5), 103800. [Google Scholar]
  2. Minseok, Song., Wil, M., P. van, der, Aalst. (2008). Towards comprehensive support for organizational mining. [Google Scholar]
  3. Smith, G., Cordes, J.: Confusing Correlation with Causation. In: The 9 Pitfalls of Data Science, pp. 155–172. Oxford University Press (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, A.: Correlation and Causation. Wilmott, 2022(118), 12–15 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  5. Games, P. A.: Correlation and causation: A logical snafu. Journal of Experimental Education, 58(3), 239–246 (1990). doi:10.1080/00220973.1990.10806538. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ruocheng Guo, Lu Cheng, Jundong Li, P. Richard Hahn, and Huan Liu. 2020. A Survey of Learning Causality with Data: Problems and Methods. ACM Comput. Surv. 53, 4, Article 75 (July 2021), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397269. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou, W., Chen, Q.: A Survey on Causal Discovery. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. Yao, L., Chu, Z., Li, S., Li, Y., Gao, J., Zhang, A.: A Survey on Causal Inference. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery From Data, 15(5), 1–37 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  9. Marin-Castro, H. M., & Tello-Leal, E. (2021). Event Log Preprocessing for Process Mining: A Review. Applied Sciences, 11(22), 10556. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rogge-Solti, A., Kasneci, G.: Temporal Anomaly Detection in Business Processes. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 218–233. Springer, Cham (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. L. Pereira and J. Varajão, “The Temporal Dimension of Business Processes Dealing with Time Constraints,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 121, pp. 1034–1038, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Senderovich, A., Weidlich, M., Gal, A. Temporal Network Representation of Event Logs for Improved Performance Modelling in Business Processes. In: Carmona, J., Engels, G., Kumar, A. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10445. Springer, Cham. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  13. Böhmer, K., & Rinderle-Ma, S. Multi instance anomaly detection in business process executions. In Business Process Management: 15th International Conference, BPM 2017, Barcelona, Spain, September 10–15, 2017, Proceedings 15 (pp. 77–93). Springer International Publishing. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. Janina, Sontheim., Florian, Richter., Thomas, Seidl. (2018). Temporal Deviations on Event Sequences. [Google Scholar]
  15. Florian Richter, Thomas Seidl, looking into the TESSERACT: Time-drifts in event streams using series of evolving rolling averages of completion times, Information Systems, Volume 84, 2019, Pages 265–282, ISSN 0306-4379. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hsu, P.-Y., Chuang, Y.-C., Lo, Y.-C., & He, S.-C. (2017). Using contextualized activity-level duration to discover irregular process instances in business operations. Information Sciences, 391–392, 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.10.027. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhao, D., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Anomaly and interestingness detection in timed hierarchical business processes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 12619–12634. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3182413. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mavroudopoulos, I., Gounaris, A. A comparison of proximity-based methods for detecting temporal anomalies in business processes. Mach Learn 112, 4101–4128 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-022-06152-5. [Google Scholar]
  19. Asma Ouarhim, Karim Baina and Brahim Elbhiri, “Towards a Continuous Temporal Improvement Approach for Real-Time Business Processes” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 15(1), 2024. [Google Scholar]
  20. Qafari, M.S., van der Aalst, W. Root Cause Analysis in Process Mining Using Structural Equation Models. In: Del Río Ortega, A., Leopold, H., Santoro, F.M. (eds) BusinessProcess Management Workshops. BPM 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 397. (2020) Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  21. Luo, Qian, Zhang, Lin, Xing, Zhiwei, Xia, Huan, Chen, Zhao-Xin, Causal Discovery of Flight Service Process Based on Event Sequence, Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 2869521, 17 pages, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Houdt, G., Depaire, B., Martin, N. (2022). Root Cause Analysis in Process Mining with Probabilistic Temporal Logic. In: Munoz-Gama, J., Lu, X. (eds) Process Mining Workshops. ICPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 433. Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  23. Qafari, M.S., van der Aalst, W.M.P. Feature recommendation for structural equation model discovery in process mining. Prog Artif Intell (2022) [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Der Aalst, W., & van der Aalst, W. (2016). Data science in action (pp. 3–23). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  25. McLachlan, G. J., & Rathnayake, S. I. (2014). On the number of components in a Gaussian mixture model. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 4(5), 341–355. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dablander, F. (2020). An introduction to causal inference. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zanga, A., Ozkirimli, E., & Stella, F. (2022). A survey on causal discovery: theory and practice. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 151, 101–129. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, W., Cai, R., Zhang, K., & Hao, Z. (2021). Causal discovery in linear non-gaussian acyclic model with multiple latent confounders. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(7), 2816–2827. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nogueira, A. R., Pugnana, A., Ruggieri, S., Pedreschi, D., & Gama, J. (2022). Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 12(2), e1449. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tharwat, A. (2021), “Independent component analysis: An introduction”, Applied Computing and Informatics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 222–249. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.