CBAM and International Law: Balancing Sustainable Trade, Climate Justice, and Legal Equity

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 660, 2025 The 1^st International Conference on Green Energy Policy and Digital Society 2025 (1^st Green-Digi 2025)


Article Number		02007
Number of page(s)		8
Section		Environmental Policy and Climate Governance in the Digital Age
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566002007
Published online		10 November 2025

C. Méndez, N. Simpson, F. Johnson, and A. Birt, Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (Full Volume) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2023. doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR69789291691647. [Google Scholar]
J. E. Hansen et al., “Global Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed?,” Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 6–44, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/00139157.2025.2434494. [Google Scholar]
M. Amendola, “Winners and Losers of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. An Intra-EU issue?,” Energy Econ., vol. 142, p. 108139, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108139. [Google Scholar]
G. Marín Durán, “Securing Compatibility of Carbon Border Adjustments With the Multilateral Climate and Trade Regimes,” Int. Comp. Law Q., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 73–103, 2023, doi: 10.1017/S0020589322000501. [Google Scholar]
D. Keumala, A. Sabirin, S. Setiyono, M. F. Az, and J. R. Arranchado, “Indonesia’s Sustainable Green Economy Policy in the Energy Sector: Challenges and Expectations,” J. Media Huk., vol. 32, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 1–20, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.18196/jmh.v32i1.24109. [Google Scholar]
A. Schulan and J. C. Heilinger, “Three Injustices of Adaptation Finance A Relational Egalitarian Analysis,” J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10806-024-09932-2. [Google Scholar]
U. R. Beck, P. K. Kruse-Andersen, and L. B. Stewart, “Carbon Leakage in a Small Open Economy: The Importance of International Climate Policies,” Energy Econ., vol. 117, p. 106447, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106447. [Google Scholar]
P. Morone and A. Alfino, “Impact of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on the Global South,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 6, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s43621-02501131-x. [Google Scholar]
K. Ye, Bin, YANG, “The extraterritorial effects of EU law in the context of green transition : comments on CBAM and the proposed CSDDD,” Chinese J. Eur. Stud., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 34–57, 2023. [Google Scholar]
K. Clausing, M. Elkerbout, K. Nehrkorn, and C. Wolfram, “How Carbon Border Adjustments Might Drive Global Climate Policy Momentum,” Resour. Futur. Rep., vol. 24–20, no. October, 2024. [Google Scholar]
B. Lin and H. Zhao, “Threatening the Poor? The Economic Impacts of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Developing Countries,” Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn., vol. 71, pp. 582–593, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2024.09.005. [Google Scholar]
G. Dolphin and Gianluigi Ferrucci, “The EU’s CBAM: Implications for Member States and Trading Partners,” Int. Monet. Fund, vol. 2025, no. 125, pp. 4–29, 2023. [Google Scholar]
W. Suwanprasert, “The role of the most favored nation principle of the GATT/WTO in the New Trade model,” Rev. Int. Econ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 760–798, 2020, doi: 10.1111/roie.12470. [Google Scholar]
A. Putra, “The Role of International Human Rights Law in Fights Against Climate Change,” J. Media Huk., vol. 28, no. 2 SE-Articles, pp. 153–164, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.18196/jmh.v28i2.10988. [Google Scholar]
S. Pedersen, D. Stevis, and A. Kalfagianni, “What is planetary justice?,” Env. Polit., vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1137–1145, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1080/09644016.2024.2418222. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.