Strategic Arbitration for Climate Change and Green Economy Dispute Resolution

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 660, 2025 The 1^st International Conference on Green Energy Policy and Digital Society 2025 (1^st Green-Digi 2025)


Article Number		02008
Number of page(s)		8
Section		Environmental Policy and Climate Governance in the Digital Age
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566002008
Published online		10 November 2025

A. F. Pérez, “Arbitration as a forum for dispute resolution and climate change disputes,” Cuad. Derecho Transnacional, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 456–492, 2022. [Google Scholar]
E. Latifah and M. N. Imanullah, “The role of arbitration in promoting compliance to climate change law,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, vol. 200, no. 1. [Google Scholar]
L. Gouiffès and M. Ordonez, “Climate change in international arbitration, the next big thing?,” J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 203–224, 2022. [Google Scholar]
K. ASSCHENFELDT and L.-M. ROSS, “The Role of International Commercial Arbitration in Mastering Climate Change Disputes: Initiatives, Advantages, and Challenges,” J. Int. Arbitr., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 317–344, 2024. [Google Scholar]
Y. Gunawan, M. F. Akbar, and E. F. Corral, “WTO Trade War Resolution for Japan’s Chemical Export Restrictions to South Korea,” Padjadjaran J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 408–431, 2022. [Google Scholar]
L. Bizikova, “On Route to Climate Justice: The Greta Effect on International Commercial Arbitration,” J. Int. Arbitr., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 79–116, 2022. [Google Scholar]
A. J. Schmitz, “Building on OArb Attributes in Pursuit of Justice,” in Arbitration in the Digital Age: The Brave New World of Arbitration, 2018, pp. 182–208. [Google Scholar]
R. Smits, Sustainable finance and climate change: Law and regulation. 2024. [Google Scholar]
K. Duggal and D. Lake, “Towards a climate responsive international investment and commercial arbitration regime,” in International Arbitration and EU Law, Second Edition, 2024, pp. 409–432. [Google Scholar]
N. J. Sari, A. A. Zulfikar, and S. Dorlah, “Implementation of International Arbitration Awards in Indonesia from the Perspective of Legal Value Theory,” J. Media Huk., vol. 31, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 167–185, Jun. 2024. [Google Scholar]
J. Alkhayer, N. Gupta, and C. M. Gupta, “The possibility of creating an ICSID protocol for the establishment of a multilateral investment tribunal: A flexible or complex process.,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1279, no. 1, p. 12032, 2023. [Google Scholar]
D. R. I. Hapsari, A. A. S. Ilmiawan, and E. Samira, “Non-litigation as An Environmental Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Indonesia,” Indones. Law Reform J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–66, 2022. [Google Scholar]
E. J. Powell and A. Pérez-Liñán, “Compliance with decisions of the Permanent Court of Arbitration,” Rev. Int. Organ., 2025. [Google Scholar]
J. Lin, “Climate change and the courts,” Leg. Stud., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 35–57, 2012. [Google Scholar]
S. Lu, “Arbitration Trends and Challenges in Transnational Commercial Disputes,” Front. Business, Econ. Manag., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 227–230, 2024. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.