EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 664 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 664 (2025) 09007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 664, 2025
4th International Seminar of Science and Applied Technology: “Green Technology and AI-Driven Innovations in Sustainability Development and Environmental Conservation” (ISSAT 2025)
Article Number 09007
Number of page(s) 13
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566409007
Published online 20 November 2025
  1. D. W. S. Renwick, T. Redman, S. Maguire, Green human resource management: a review and research agenda, Int. J. Manage. Rev. 15, 1–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x [Google Scholar]
  2. S. K. Srivastava, Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review, Int. J. Manage. Rev. 9, 53–80 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  3. H. An, A. Razzaq, A. Nawaz, S. M. Noman, S. A. R. Khan, Nexus between green logistic operations and triple bottom line: evidence from infrastructure-led Chinese outward foreign direct investment in Belt and Road host countries, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 51022–51045 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12470-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. S. J. Chapman, R. Gallina, N. Devenish, Business studies in action: preliminary course (John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd, Milton, QLD, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Siefan, A. Alkaabi, H. R. Almarzooqi, et al., Impact of operational excellence frameworks on sustainable performance in services: a qualitative study, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 42, 1753–1792 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2024-0315 [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Swarnakar, M. Khalfan, Unveiling the impact of operational excellence practices on corporate performance: an exploratory research, TQM J. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2024-0224 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Boyce, J. Veitch, G. Newsham, M. Myer, C. Hunter, Lighting quality and office work: a field simulation study (2003). https://doi.org/10.4224/20393390 [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Johnson, T. Zimmermann, C. Bird, The effect of work environments on productivity and satisfaction of software engineers, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 47, 736–757 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2903053 [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Zhenjing, S. Chupradit, K. Y. Ku, A. A. Nassani, M. Haffar, Impact of employees’ workplace environment on employees’ performance: a multi-mediation model, Front. Public Health 10, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890400 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Reznik, C. Hungerford, R. Kornhaber, M. Cleary, Home-based work and ergonomics: physical and psychosocial considerations, Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 43, 975–979 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2021.1875276 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Oakman, V. Weale, N. Kinsman, H. Nguyen, R. Stuckey, Workplace physical and psychosocial hazards: a systematic review of evidence-informed hazard identification tools, Appl. Ergon. 100, 103614 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103614 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Firmansyah, M. Gunarto, A. Andriyansah, Synergy of occupational safety and work environment to support productivity and sustainable well-being in the port sector, Society 12, 859–882 (2024). https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.716 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. R. Chauhan, A. Chauhan, A study on work management practices and its impact on productivity: moderating role of sustainable work environment, Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. Rev. 6, (2023). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i10-12 [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Mohamad, N. Z. Abiddin, Enhancing employee well-being and productivity in evolving work environments, Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 13, 289 (2024). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0081 [Google Scholar]
  15. D. C. Feldman, The development and enforcement of group norms, Acad. Manage. Rev. 9, 47–53 (1984). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277934 [Google Scholar]
  16. R. B. Cialdini, M. R. Trost, Social influence: social norms, conformity and compliance, in The handbook of social psychology, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (eds.) (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998), 151–192. [Google Scholar]
  17. G. L. W. Perry, J. A. Finlayson, A. R. Henderson, et al., Evaluating the role of social norms in fostering pro-environmental behaviors, Front. Environ. Sci. 9, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.620125 [Google Scholar]
  18. Q. R. Jett, J. M. George, Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life, Acad. Manage. Rev. 28, 494–507 (2003). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196791 [Google Scholar]
  19. J. V. Bittner, Goal interruptions and task performance: the additional influence of goal orientations, Learn. Motiv. 76, 101768 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101768 [Google Scholar]
  20. B. C. Lee, V. G. Duffy, The effects of task interruption on human performance: a study of the systematic classification of human behavior and interruption frequency, Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 25, 137–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20603 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. H. Long, K. A. Basoglu, The impact of task interruption on tax accountants’ professional judgment, Accounting Organ. Soc. 55, 96–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Leroy, A. M. Schmidt, N. Madjar, Working from home during COVID-19: a study of the interruption landscape, J. Appl. Psychol. 106, 1448–1465 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000972 [Google Scholar]
  23. I. U. Haque, A. I. Ali, Green HRM and organizational sustainability: a quantitative corporate study, Int. J. Experiential Learn. Case Stud. 9, 374–407 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22555/ijelcs.v9i2.1184 [Google Scholar]
  24. U. Al-Minhas, N. O. Ndubisi, F. Z. Barrane, Corporate environmental management, Manage. Environ. Qual.: Int. J. 31, 431–450 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07- 2019-0161 [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Balagué, J. Saarti (eds.), Quality management systems – requirements, in Managing your library and its quality (Elsevier, 2011), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-654-8.50006-3 [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Şeker, E. Örücü, A. Kaya (eds.), Green management approaches to organizational behavior (IGI Global, 2025). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8824-2 [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Adamonienė, L. Litavniece, L. Ruibytė, E. Viduolienė, Influence of individual and organisational variables on the perception of organisational values, Eng. Manage. Prod. Serv. 13, 7–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0008 [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Fernandes, R. Pereira, G. Wiedenhöft, Organizational culture and the individuals’ discretionary behaviors at work: a cross-cultural analysis, Front. Sociol. 8, (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1190488 [Google Scholar]
  29. J. S. Zide, M. J. Mills, C. Shahani-Denning, C. Sweetapple, Work interruptions resiliency: toward an improved understanding of employee efficiency, J. Organ. Eff.: People Perform. 4, 39–58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-04-2016-0031 [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Feldman, D. Greenway, It’s a matter of time: the role of temporal perceptions in emotional experiences of work interruptions, Group Organ. Manage. 46, 70–104 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120959288 [Google Scholar]
  31. D. D. Bobek, R. W. Roberts, J. T. Sweeney, The social norms of tax compliance: evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States, J. Bus. Ethics 74, 49–64 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9219-x [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, R. R. Sinkovics, The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Adv. Int. Market. 20, 277–319 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014 [Google Scholar]
  33. J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Routledge, 2013). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 [Google Scholar]
  34. W. W. Chin, G. A. Marcoulides, The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, in Modern methods for business research 8, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. I. Roszelan, M. Shahrom, Readiness for artificial intelligence adoption in Malaysian manufacturing companies, J. Inf. Technol. Manage. 17, 1–13 (2025). https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2025.99920 [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Mouakket, M. Aboelmaged, Factors influencing green information technology adoption: a multi-level perspective in emerging economies context, Inf. Dev. 39, 699–719 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211048489 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.