Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 668, 2025
2025 International Conference on Structural and Civil Engineering (ICSCE 2025)
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Construction Information Management and Digital Delivery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566805001
Published online 27 November 2025
  1. Borkowski, A. S., Drozd, W., & Zima, K. (2024). The Status of the Implementation of the Building Information Modeling Mandate in Poland: A Literature Review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(10), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13100343 [Google Scholar]
  2. Zakon.kz. (2017) The Concept for the Implementation of Building Information Modeling Technology in Industrial and Civil Construction of the Republic of Kazakhstan (approved by the order of the Committee for Construction and Housing of August 14, 2017, No. 163-NК). Retrieved from https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=39585910 [Google Scholar]
  3. Awwad, K., Shibani, A., & Ghostin, M. (2020). Exploring the critical success factors influencing BIM level 2 implementation in the UK construction industry: the case of SMEs. International Journal of Construction Management, 22, 1894–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1744213. [Google Scholar]
  4. Emmanuel, I., Danquah, E., Ukpoju, E., Obasa, J., Olola, T., & Enyejo, J. (2024). Use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Improve Construction Management in the USA. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2794. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aksenova, G., Kiviniemi, A., Kocaturk, T., & Lejeune, A. (2018). From Finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Construction Management and Economics, 37, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1481985. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Z., Lu, Y., Nath, T., Wang, Q., Tiong, R., & Peh, L. (2021). Critical success factors for BIM adoption during construction phase: a Singapore case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2020-1072. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ji, D., & Turkan, Y. (2021). Analyzing the Impact of Government-driven BIM adoption: Introducing the case of South Korea. Proceedings of the 38th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2021/0133. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Y., Yin, Y., Browne, G., & Li, D. (2019). Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2017-0246. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lahiani, M. (2020). Benefits of BIM implementation in the French construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042055. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pellegrini L, Campi S, Locatelli M, Pattini G, Di Giuda GM and Tagliabue LC (2020) Digital Transition and Waste Management in Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Operations Industry. Front. Energy Res. 8:576462. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.576462 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hong, Y., Hammad, A., Sepasgozar, S., & Akbarnezhad, A. (2018). BIM adoption model for small and medium construction organisations in Australia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2017-0064. [Google Scholar]
  12. AbuMoeilak, L., & Beheiry, S. (2023). An exploratory study on the building information modeling maturity level: a literature review. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction. https://doi.org/10.14455/10.14455/isec.2023.10(1).aae-11. [Google Scholar]
  13. Famakin, I., Othman, I., Kineber, A., Oke, A., Olanrewaju, O., Hamed, M., & Olayemi, T. (2023). Building Information Modeling Execution Drivers for Sustainable Building Developments. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043445. [Google Scholar]
  14. Liao, L., & Teo, E. A. L. (2017). Critical Success Factors for enhancing the Building Information Modelling implementation in building projects in Singapore. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 23(8), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1374300 [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, X. (2017). A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Automation in Construction, 80, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.04.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Salykov, A., Shalbolova, U., & Junusova, A. (2024). Transformation in Kazakhstan’s construction industry amidst digitalisation of the economy. Infrastructure Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.24.00037. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zakon.kz. Order of the Chairperson of the Committee for Construction and Housing and Utilities Services of the Ministry of Industry and Construction of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated February 20, 2025 No. 33-NК “On Approval of the Concept for the Implementation of Building Information Modeling Technology in Industrial and Civil Construction of the Republic of Kazakhstan”. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31933344 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiang, R., Wu, C., Lei, X., Shemery, A., Hampson, K., & Wu, P. (2021). Government efforts and roadmaps for building information modeling implementation: lessons from Singapore, the UK and the US. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2019-0438. [Google Scholar]
  19. KazRICA JSC. ESKKS — Unified System of Classification and Coding in Construction. Retrieved May 13, 2025, from https://eskks.kazniisa.kz/login [Google Scholar]
  20. State Expertise JSC. State Information Model Bank (GBIM): Project Register. Retrieved May 13, 2025, from https://gbim1.epsd.kz/info/project-register [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, K., Guo, F., Zhang, C., & Schaefer, D. (2022). From Industry 4.0 to Construction 4.0: barriers to the digital transformation of engineering and construction sectors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-05-2022-0383. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kabzhan Z, Shakhnovich A, Gorshkov S, Yemenov Y, Gorshkov F and Shogelova N (2025) Semantic and ontology-based analysis of regulatory documents for construction industry digitalization. Front. Built Environ. 11:1575913. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1575913 [Google Scholar]
  23. Yu, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Comparative Study on BIM Acceptance Model by Adoption Period. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061450. [Google Scholar]
  24. Noardo, F., Ohori, A., Krijnen, T., & Stoter, J. (2021). An Inspection of IFC Models from Practice. Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP11052232. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sheik, N., Veelaert, P., & Deruyter, G. (2023). Exchanging Progress Information Using IFC-Based BIM for Automated Progress Monitoring. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092390. [Google Scholar]
  26. Danvila-Del-Valle, I., Estévez-Mendoza, C., & Lara, F. (2019). Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.02.026. [Google Scholar]
  27. Qin, X., Shi, Y., Lyu, K., & Mo, Y. (2020). Using a tam-toe model to explore factors of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the construction industry. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26, 259–277. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12176. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang, C., Xiong, F., Hu, Q., Liu, R., & Li, S. (2023). Incentive Mechanism of BIM Application in Prefabricated Buildings Based on Evolutionary Game Analysis. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051162. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jin, M., & Li, B. (2023). Dual-Level Framework for OpenBIM-Enabled Design Collaboration. Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123031. [Google Scholar]
  30. Borrmann, A., Forster, C., Liebich, T., König, M., Tulke, J. (2021). Germany’s Governmental BIM Initiative – The BIM4INFRA2020 Project Implementing the BIM Roadmap. In: Toledo Santos, E., Scheer, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. ICCCBE 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 98. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51295-8_31 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.