Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 669, 2025
6th International Conference on Environmental Design and Health (ICED2025)
Article Number 09004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566909004
Published online 26 November 2025
  1. Al Qahtani, N., Sadowski, R., & Elkamel, A. (2025). Process simulation and techno-economic analysis of carbon dioxide utilization via reverse water–gas shift reaction and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Carbon Resources Conversion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2025.100677 [Google Scholar]
  2. Carbon Direct. (n.d.). What is direct air capture? Carbon Direct. https://www.carbon- direct.com/insights/direct-air-capture-simply- explained [Google Scholar]
  3. Haszeldine, R. S. (2009). Carbon capture and storage: How green can black be? Science, 325(5948), 1647–1652. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172246 [Google Scholar]
  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (n.d.). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ [Google Scholar]
  5. Kheirinik, M., Ahmed, S., & Rahmanian, N. (2021). Comparative techno-economic analysis of carbon capture processes: Pre-combustion, post- combustion, and oxyfuel combustion operations. Sustainability, 13(24), 13567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413567 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kopac, T., & Demirel, Y. (2025). Optimizing CO₂ capture from biogas: A comparative study of amine- based solvents through Aspen Plus simulations. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-025-06668-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Olayebi, O. (2022). Modelling and simulation of carbon dioxide capture plant from refinery flue gas in Nigeria using Aspen HYSYS V8.8. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(2), 144–150. https://ijsrset.com/IJSRSET229213 [Google Scholar]
  8. Quéré, C. L., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz, J., Manning, A. C., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Andrews, O. D., Arora, V. K., Bakker, D. C. E., Barbero, L., Becker, M., Betts, R. A., Bopp, L., ... Zhu, D. (2018). Global carbon budget 2017. Earth System Science Data, 10(1), 405–448. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-405-2018 [Google Scholar]
  9. U.S. Department of Energy. (2024, August). Direct air capture factsheet. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024- 08/Direct%20Air%20Capture%20Factsheet_August%202024.pdf [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, C., Jun, K.-W., Gao, R., Kwak, G., & Park, H.-G. (2017). Carbon dioxide utilization in a gas-to- methanol process combined with CO₂/steam-mixed reforming: Techno-economic analysis. Fuel, 190, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.008 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.