EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 680 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 680 (2025) 00063 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
Article Number 00063
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000063
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., Stavropoulos, A., & Bezirtzoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mannucci, P., Harari, S., Martinelli, I., & Franchini, M. (2015). Effects on health of air pollution: a narrative review. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 10, 657-662. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hemamalini, R., Vinodhini, R., Shanthini, B., Partheeban, P., Charumathy, M., & Cornelius, K. (2022). Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting using Smart Drones and Recurrent Neural Network for Sustainable Development in Chennai City. Sustainable Cities and Society. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rafaj, P., Kiesewetter, G., Gül, T., Schöpp, W., Cofala, J., Klimont, Z., Purohit, P., Heyes, C., Amann, M., Borken-Kleefeld, J., & Cozzi, L. (2018). Outlook for clean air in the context of sustainable development goals. Global Environmental Change. [Google Scholar]
  5. Idrees, Z., & Zheng, L. (2020). Low cost air pollution monitoring systems: A review of protocols and enabling technologies. J. Ind. Inf. Integr., 17, 100123. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dhingra, S., Madda, R., Gandomi, A., Patan, R., & Daneshmand, M. (2019). Internet of Things Mobile–Air Pollution Monitoring System (IoT-Mobair). IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6, 5577-5584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moharana, B., Anand, P., Kumar, S., & Kodali, P. (2020). Development of an IoT-based Real-Time Air Quality Monitoring Device. 2020 International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP), 191-194. [Google Scholar]
  8. Janaki, K., Eapen, M., Meera, M., Bhendale, M., Arun, S., & Krishnamoorthy, R. (2024). Enhancing Environmental Safety: Design and Development of IoT based Air Quality Monitoring System. 2024 5th International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (ICIPCN), 845-850. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khan, A., Khan, M., Hasan, M., Zakri, W., Alhazmi, W., & Islam, T. (2022). An Efficient Wireless Sensor Network Based on the ESP-MESH Protocol for Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality Monitoring. Sustainability. [Google Scholar]
  10. Manshur, T., Luiu, C., Avis, W., Bukachi, V., Gatari, M., Mulligan, J., Ng’an’ga, D., Radcliffe, J., Singh, A., Waiguru, E., Wandera, A., & Pope, F. (2023). A Citizen Science Approach for Air Quality Monitoring in a Kenyan Informal Development. City and Environment Interactions. [Google Scholar]
  11. Commodore, A., Wilson, S., Muhammad, O., Svendsen, E., & Pearce, J. (2017). Community-based participatory research for the study of air pollution: a review of motivations, approaches, and outcomes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189, 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  12. El Khaili, M., Bakkoury, J., Khiat, A., & Alloubane, A. (2018). Crowdsourcing by IoT using LabVIEW for measuring the air quality. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jiao, W., Hagler, G., Williams, R., Sharpe, R., Brown, R., Garver, D., & Rice, J. (2016). Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9(11), 5281–5292. [Google Scholar]
  14. El Arfaoui, A., Nhaila, H., & El Khaili, M. (2025). Developing a real-time atmospheric pollutant monitoring method with high accuracy and wide measurement range. 2025 5th International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET). [Google Scholar]
  15. Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B., & Bartonova, A. (2017). Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates? Environment International, 99, 293–302. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rai, A. C., Kumar, P., Pilla, F., Skouloudis, A. N., Di Sabatino, S., Ratti, C., & Yasar, A. (2017). End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring. Science of The Total Environment, 607-608, 691–705. [Google Scholar]
  17. Essamlali, I., Nhaila, H., & Khaili, M. E. (2025). Impact of urban block shape on traffic and air quality: A SUMO-based comparative study of rectangular, radial, and triangular forms. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 31, 101413. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar, P., Skouloudis, A. N., Bell, M., Viana, M., Carotta, M. C., Biskos, G., & Morawska, L. (2020). Real-time sensors for indoor air monitoring and challenges ahead in deploying them to urban buildings. Science of The Total Environment, 751, 141803. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zikova, N., Masiol, M., Chalupa, D. C., Rich, D. Q., Ferro, A. R., Hopke, P. K., & Utell, M. J. (2017). Estimating hourly concentrations of PM2.5 across a metropolitan area using low-cost particle monitors. Sensors, 17(9), 1922. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.