EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 680 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 680 (2025) 00066 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
Article Number 00066
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000066
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. K. Yakoubi, S. Montassir, H. Moustabchir, A. Elkhalfi, M. L. Scutaru, and S. Vlase, “T-Stress Evaluation Based Cracking of Pipes Using an Extended Isogeometric Analysis (X-IGA). Symmetry 2022, 14, 1065,” 2022, s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published. [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Mechab, A. Benouar, B. A. B. Bouiadjra, M. Salem, and K. Kaddouri, “A New Investigation of Plastic Limit of Repaired Steel Pipe Elbow With Bonded Composite Wrap Subjected to Internal Pressure,” J. Press. Vessel Technol., vol. 147, no. 6, p. 61302, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  3. Z. Li, X. Jiang, and H. Hopman, “Surface crack growth in offshore metallic pipes under cyclic loads: A literature review,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, p. 339, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Ali Ghaffari and H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, “Fatigue crack propagation analysis of repaired pipes with composite patch under cyclic pressure,” J. Press. Vessel Technol., vol. 135, no. 3, p. 31402, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ľ. Gajdoš, M. Šperl, J. Bayer, and J. Kuželka, “Comparison of J Integral Assessments for Cracked Plates and Pipes,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 15, p. 4324, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Montassir, K. Yakoubi, H. Moustabchir, A. Elkhalfi, D. K. Rajak, and C. I. Pruncu, “Analysis of crack behaviour in pipeline system using FAD diagram based on numerical simulation under XFEM,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 17, p. 6129, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Choi and S.-J. Lee, “Probabilistic Fatigue Crack Growth Prediction for Pipelines with Initial Flaws,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 1775, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. El Fakkoussi, S. Vlase, M. Marin, O. Koubaiti, A. Elkhalfi, and H. Moustabchir, “Predicting Stress Intensity Factor for Aluminum 6062 T6 Material in L-Shaped Lower Control Arm (LCA) Design Using Extended Finite Element Analysis,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 206, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Seenuan, N. Noraphaiphipaksa, and C. Kanchanomai, “Stress Intensity Factors for Pressurized Pipes with an Internal Crack: The Prediction Model Based on an Artificial Neural Network,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 20, p. 11446, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Wang, A. Zhou, G. Fu, C.-Q. Li, D. Robert, and M. Mahmoodian, “Evaluation of stress intensity factor for cast iron pipes with sharp corrosion pits,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 81, pp. 254–269, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Chaplin, “Major accident hazard pipeline failure frequency calculation using fracture mechanics,” in Safety and Reliability, Taylor & Francis, 2017, pp. 217–232. [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Yakoubi et al., “An extended finite element method (XFEM) study on the elastic t-stress evaluations for a notch in a pipe steel exposed to internal pressure,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 507, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Kalyanam et al., “Constraint effects in slow crack growth test methods for service life prediction of high density polyethylene piping,” J. Press. Vessel Technol., vol. 142, no. 4, p. 41508, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. J. Shim, J. S. Park, R. Kurth, and D. Rudland, “Surface to through-wall crack transition model for circumferential cracks in pipes,” J. Press. Vessel Technol., vol. 144, no. 1, p. 11306, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. T. L. Anderson and T. L. Anderson, Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. CRC press, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Cravero and C. Ruggieri, “Structural integrity analysis of axially cracked pipelines using conventional and constraint-modified failure assessment diagrams,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 607–617, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Dotta and C. Ruggieri, “Structural integrity assessments of high pressure pipelines with axial flaws using a micromechanics model,” Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip., vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 761–770, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Lo, S. Karuppanan, and M. Ovinis, “ANN-and FEA-based assessment equation for a corroded pipeline with a single corrosion defect,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 476, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. El Kiri, L. Zahiri, K. Mansouri, Z. Mighouar, and S. El Ouardi, “Prediction of the rupture pressure of a corroded pipeline by ANN,” in E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2023, p. 31. [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. El Kiri, Z. Mighouar, L. Zahiri, K. Mansouri, S. El Ouardi, and H. Chaiti, “Predicting the failure of plain dent pipeline subjected to cyclic loads using an artificial neural network,” in 2023 7th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), IEEE, 2023, pp. 179–186. [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Oh, J. Race, S. Oterkus, and B. Koo, “Burst pressure prediction of API 5L X-grade dented pipelines using deep neural network,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 10, p. 766, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. C. Newman Jr, “Fracture analysis of surface-and through-cracked sheets and plates,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 667–689, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. El-Sayed, A. El Domiaty, and A. H. I. Mourad, “Fracture assessment of axial crack in steel pipe under internal pressure,” Procedia Eng., vol. 130, pp. 1273–1287, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Zahiri, Z. Mighouar, H. Khatib, K. Mansouri, and B. Salhi, “Fatigue behavior of longitudinal welded pipes subjected to cyclic internal pressure, containing welding defects,” Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol., pp. 560–569, 2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.