Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
Article Number 00065
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000065
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. Acerbi, C. (2002). Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1505–1518. [Google Scholar]
  2. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical finance, 9(3), 203–228. [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of economic theory, 2(3), 244–263. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berkhouch, M., Lakhnati, G., & Muller, F. M. From economic inequality to financial downside variability. (Working Paper). [Google Scholar]
  5. Föllmer, H., & Schied, A. (2002). Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance and stochastics, 6(4), 429–447. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gini, C. (1921). Measurement of inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal, 31(121), 124–126. [Google Scholar]
  7. Giorgi, G. M., & Crescenzi, M. (2001). A proposal of poverty measures based on the bonferroni inequality index. Metron, 59(3-4), 3–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Greselin, F., & Zitikis, R. (2018). From the classical gini index of income inequality to a new zenga-type relative measure of risk: A modellers perspective. Econometrics, 6(1), 4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Greselin, F., Pasquazzi, L., & Zitikis, R. (2013). Contrasting the gini and zenga indices of economic inequality. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40(2), 282–297. [Google Scholar]
  10. Harlow, W. V. (1991). Asset allocation in a downside-risk framework. Financial analysts journal, 47(5), 28–40. [Google Scholar]
  11. IBGE. (2019). Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 2017-2018 : primeiros resultados. Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento. [Google Scholar]
  12. IBGE. (2020). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. https://ibge.gov.br/. [Google Scholar]
  13. Keating, C., & Shadwick, W. F. (2002). A universal performance measure. Journal of performance measurement, 6(3), 59–84. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications of the American statistical association, 9(70), 209–219. [Google Scholar]
  15. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mao, T., & Wang, R. (2018). Risk aversion in regulatory capital principles. Available at SSRN 2658669. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nawrocki, D. N. (1999). A brief history of downside risk measures. The Journal of Investing, 8(3), 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  18. Righi, M. B., & Ceretta, P. S. (2016). Shortfall deviation risk: An alternative for risk measurement. Journal of Risk, 19(2). [Google Scholar]
  19. Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S., & Zabarankin, M. (2006). Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Finance and Stochastics, 10(1), 51–74. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryan, J. A., Ulrich, J. M., Thielen, W., Tector, P., Bronder, S., & Ulrich, M. J. M. (2019). Package quantmod. http://cran.hafro.is/web/packages/quantmod/quantmod.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of business, 39(1), 119–138. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yitzhaki, S. (1983). On an extension of the gini inequality index. International economic review, 24(3), 617–628. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yitzhaki, S., & Schechtman, E. (2005). The properties of the extended gini measures of variability and inequality. Available at SSRN 815564. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yitzhaki, S., & Schechtman, E. (2013). More than a dozen alternative ways of spelling gini. In The Gini Methodology (pp. 11–31). Springer. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zenga, M. (2007). Inequality curve and inequality index based on the ratios between lower and upper arithmetic means. Statistica and Applicazioni, 5, 3–27. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.