Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00095 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000095 | |
| Published online | 19 December 2025 | |
- Forrester, A., Sobester, A., & Keane, A. (2008). Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Yang, L., & Luo, Y. (2020). Surrogate-assisted aerodynamic optimization of airfoils using machine learning. Aerospace Science and Technology, 98, 105686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105686 [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y., Zhao, N., Wang, Y., & Xu, H. (2021). Deep learning-based aerodynamic design for airfoils. Aerospace Science and Technology, 113, 106700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106700 [Google Scholar]
- Sekar, V., Fidkowski, K. J., & Kothari, M. (2020). Fast aerodynamic predictions across Reynolds and Mach numbers using neural network surrogates. AIAA Journal, 58(7), 3076–3088. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059067 [Google Scholar]
- Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998). Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 13(4), 455–492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R. M., Friswell, M. I., & Inman, D. J. (2011). A review of morphing aircraft. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22(9), 823–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X11414084 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ajaj, R. M., Friswell, M. I., & Dettmer, W. G. (2017). Morphing aircraft: The need for a new design philosophy. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 91, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.12.002 [Google Scholar]
- Sofla, A. Y. N., Meguid, S. A., Tan, K. T., & Yeo, W. K. (2010). Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges. Materials & Design, 31(3), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.022 [Google Scholar]
- U. K. Alam, F. Rabby, and M. M. Alam, “Modeling and optimization of NACA 2412 airfoil,” in Proc. National Conference on Energy Technology and Industrial Automation (NCETIA 2018), Chittagong, Bangladesh, Dec. 2018 [Google Scholar]
- Ennaji, M., Tayane, S., & Gaber, J. (2019). Modelling and simulation of the behavior of a shape memory membrane for 4D prototyping. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2650 [Google Scholar]
- Tayane, S., Gaber, J., Ennaji, M., & Akhiate, A. (2020). Programmable matter for 4D prototyping. IEEE Concurrency. 10.1109/ICoCS.2019.8930788 [Google Scholar]
- Gaber, J., Chafik, A. A., Ennaji, M., Tayane, S. (2023). Dispositif programmable à mémoire de forme. Patent WO2023066999A1, published 2023-04-27. [Google Scholar]
- Chafik, A. A., Gaber, J., Tayane, S., Ennaji, M., Bourgeois, J., El-Ghazawi, T & … (2024). From conventional to programmable matter systems: A review of design, materials, and technologies. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(8). https://doi.org/10.1145/3653671 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.