EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 683 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 683 (2026) 01016 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 683, 2026
2025 2nd International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2025)
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 5
Section Urban Planning and Spatial Governance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668301016
Published online 09 January 2026
  1. K. Ali, H. Alhajlah, M. Kassem, Collaboration and Risk in Building Information Modelling (BIM): A Systematic Literature Review [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Alotaibi, R. Liu, C. Wang, Legal and Contractual Implications of BIM Implementation in Construction Projects, Constr. Law J. 41(1), 34–50 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Arshad, M.J. Thaheem, A.R. Nasir, Risk-sharing Mechanisms in BIM Projects: A Systematic Review, Autom. Constr. 98, 51–63 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. H.Y. Chong, C.Y. Lee, X. Wang, A Mixed Review of the Adoption of BIM for Sustainability, J. Clean. Prod. 142, 4114–4126 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Hochscheid, M. Falardeau, J. Lapalme, C. Boton, L. Rivest, Practitioners’ Concerns about Their Liability toward BIM Collaborative Digital Mockups: Case Study in Civil Engineering, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. (2023). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Sacks, U. Gurevich, C. Eastman, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, J. Tamosaitiene, Risk Assessment in Construction Projects, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 10(3), 123–134 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Almarri, M. Aljarman, H. Boussabaine, Emerging contractual and legal risks from the application of building information modelling, Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 26(10), 2307–2325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-06-2018-0224 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Mohammadi, A.A. Aibinu, M. Oraee, Risk Allocation and Mitigation Practices for Building Information Modeling: Addressing Legal and Contractual Risks Associated with Contract Documentation, J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr. 16(2) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-1039 [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Kuiper, D. Holzer, “Rethinking the contractual context for building information modelling (BIM) in the Australian built environment industry,” Constr. Econ. Build. 13, 1–17 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. K.-M. Hsu, T.-Y. Hsieh, J.-H. Chen, “Legal risks incurred under the application of BIM in Taiwan,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Forensic Eng. 168, 127–133 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. M. Farouk, A. Z. Zulhisham, Y. S. Lee, M. S. Rajabi, R. A. Rahman, “Factors, Challenges and Strategies of Trust in BIM-Based Construction Projects: A Case Study in Malaysia,” Infrastructures, 8, 13 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. A. Ragab, M. Marzouk, “BIM adoption in construction contracts: content analysis approach,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 147, 04021094 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Manderson, M. Jefferies, G. Brewer, “Building information modelling and standardised construction contracts: a content analysis of the GC21 contract,” Constr. Econ. Build. 15, 72–84 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Philp, D. Frise, First steps to BIM competence: a guide for specialist contractors, SEC Group (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Azhar, “Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry,” Lead. Manag. Eng. 11, 241–252 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Volk, J. Stengel, F. Schultmann, “Corrigendum to ‘Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings — literature review and future needs’,” Autom. Constr. 43, 204 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Dogonyaro, A. Elnokaly, Enabling BIM innovation through knowledge-driven legal– contractual risk management: a novel strategic risk breakdown structure. Appl Sci. 2025;15(24):13038. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Mahbod, The impact of contractual language and trust on the successful conduct of BIM-enabled projects, doctoral dissertation, École de technologie supérieure (2021). [Google Scholar]
  20. Institution of Civil Engineers. NEC4: Engineering and Construction Contract. 4th ed. ICE Publishing; (2018). [Google Scholar]
  21. S. L. Fan. Comparative study for BIM-based contract administration between the cases in Taiwan and China. J Chin Inst Eng. 43:648-656 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. F. Abanda, A. Akintola, V. Tuhaise, J. Tah, “BIM ontology for information management (BIM-OIM),” SSRN (2024). doi:10.2139/ssrn.4903340 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. I. A. K. Hasni, Z. Ismail, N. Hashim. Contractual aspects in the utilisation of level two building information modelling (BIM) within Malaysian public construction projects. MATEC Web Conf. 266:05002 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Nguyen. BIM in construction: Benefits, challenges, and development trends. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Technol. 12:160-165(2025). [Google Scholar]
  25. X. Zhao, P. Wu, X. Wang. Risk paths in BIM adoption: Empirical study of China. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 25:1170-1187 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. K.J. Aladayleh, M.J. Aladaileh. Applying analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to BIM-based risk management for optimal performance in construction projects. Buildings. 14:3632 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  27. A.R. Radzi, N.F. Azmi, S.N. Kamaruzzaman, M. Algahtany, R.A. Rahman. Challenges in construction readiness for BIM-based building projects. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 24:1689-1704 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  28. A.F. Kineber, I. Othman, I.O. Famakin, A.E. Oke, M.M. Hamed, T.M. Olayemi. Challenges to the implementation of building information modeling (BIM) for sustainable construction projects. Appl Sci. 13:3426 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Durdyev, J. Mbachu, D. Thurnell, L. Zhao, M.R. Hosseini. BIM adoption in the Cambodian construction industry: Key drivers and barriers. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf. 10:215 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Waqar, I. Othman, R.A. González-Lezcano. Challenges to the implementation of BIM for the risk management of oil and gas construction projects: Structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability. 15:8019 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  31. A.S. Bello, M. Abdullahi, H.A. Ahmadu. Causal relationship amongst risk factors impacting the adoption of building information modeling (BIM) in Nigeria. Int J Real Estate Stud. 16:23-33 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Liu, B. Xie, L. Tivendal, C. Liu. Critical barriers to BIM implementation in the AEC industry. Int J Mark Stud. 7:162 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  33. T.M. Jo, S.S.M. Ishak, Z.Z.A. Rashid. Overview of the legal aspects and contract requirements of the BIM practice in Malaysian construction industry. MATEC Web Conf. 203:02011 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  34. D.K. Smith, M. Tardiff. Building information modeling. (2009). doi:10.1002/9780470432846 [Google Scholar]
  35. K. Torres, O. Sánchez, K. Castañeda, M. Noguera, D. Carrasco-Beltrán, S. Vidal-Méndez, N. E. Lozano-Ramírez. ‘Exploring the knowledge structure of building information modeling (BIM) adoption in construction scheduling: A bibliometric analysis from 2008 to 2024’. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 16(8),(2025) [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Mordue, P. Swaddle, D. Philp. Building Information Modeling For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons; (2015). [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Chen, Z. Yan, J. Chen, Q. Li. Building information modeling (BIM) outsourcing decisions of contractors in the construction industry: Constructing and validating a conceptual model. Dev Built Environ. 12:100090 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  38. R. Cropanzano, E.L. Anthony, S.R. Daniels, A.V. Hall. Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann. 11:479-516 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Watson. Strategy: An introduction to game theory. W.W. Norton; (2002). [Google Scholar]
  40. E. Ostrom. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Perspect. 14:137-158 (2000). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.