Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 688, 2026
The 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment, Development, and Energy (CONSER 2025)
Article Number 07005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Sustainable Urban Development, Climate Adaptation, and Policy Integration
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668807005
Published online 20 January 2026
  1. M.C.P.A. Islami, R.N. Sari, M. Waluyo, and Q.Z.M. Arifin, Analysis of green product implementation strategy in the batik industry to develop eco-friendly, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1454, 012029 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1454/1/012029 [Google Scholar]
  2. M.R. Permana, M.C.P.A. Islami, and T. Tranggono, Analysis of the effect of management commitment, safety compliance, and safety awareness on safety culture. J. La Sociale. 6, 1267–1279 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Ullah, F.U. Khan, and N. Ahmad, Promoting sustainability through green innovation adoption: A case of manufacturing industry. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 29, 21119–21139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17322-8 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Hirschhorn, T. Jackson, and L. Baas, Towards prevention—the emerging environmental management paradigm. Clean Prod. Strateg. 125–142 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Mady, I. Anwar, and R.S. Abdelkareem, Nexus between regulatory pressure, eco-friendly product demand and sustainable competitive advantage of manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of eco-innovation. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 26, 1–23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05096-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Baah, D. O. Agyeman, I. S. K. Acquah, Y. A. Mensah, E. Afum, D. Faibil, F. A. M. Abdoulaye, Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 27, 100–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Chen and L. Cao, How do enterprises achieve sustainable success in the green manufacturing era? The impact of organizational environmental identity on green competitive advantage in China. Kybernetes. 54, 71–89 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2022-0597 [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Lee, Drivers of green supply chain integration and green product innovation: A motivation-opportunity-ability framework and a dynamic capabilities perspective. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 34, 476–495 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2022-0311 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Agustin, T. Tranggono, and M.C.P.A. Islami, Application of FMECA and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for occupational safety and health risk analysis in the production process of steel fabrication, Indonesia. Interdiscip. J. Sharia Econ. 8, 8957–8972 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Zeng, W. Zhong, and S. Naz, Can environmental knowledge and risk perception make a difference? The role of environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in fostering sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability. 15, 4791 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064791 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Baier, M. Göttsche, A. Hellmann, and F. Schiemann, Too good to be true: Influencing credibility perceptions with signaling reference explicitness and assurance depth. J. Bus. Ethics. 178, 695–714 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04719-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Guo, M. Dong, C. Tsinopoulos, and M. Xu, The influential capacity of carbon neutrality environmental orientation in modulating stakeholder engagement toward green manufacturing. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 31, 292–310 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2570 [Google Scholar]
  13. G.N. Achmad et al., Government support, eco-regulation and eco-innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating role of eco-environmental capability. J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex. 9, 100158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100158 [Google Scholar]
  14. A.K. Vangeri, S. Bathrinath, M.C.J. Anand, M. Shanmugathai, N. Meenatchi, and S. Boopathi, Green supply chain management in eco-friendly sustainable manufacturing industries. Environ. Appl. Carbon-Based Mater. 253–287 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  15. S.R. Natasia, Y.T. Wiranti, and A. Parastika, Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the technology acceptance model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 197, 512–520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016ZJ.procs.2021.12.168 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.