Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 706, 2026
3rd International Conference on Environment, Green Technology, and Digital Society (INTERCONNECTS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | ICT and Computer Science | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670603004 | |
| Published online | 21 April 2026 | |
- World Health Organization, Global status report on road safety 2023, vol. 15, no. 4. 2023. [Google Scholar]
- R. Trauth, K. Moller, and J. Betz, “Toward Safer Autonomous Vehicles: Occlusion-Aware Trajectory Planning to Minimize Risky Behavior,” IEEE Open J. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 4, no. November, pp. 929–942, 2023, doi: 10.1109/OJITS.2023.3336464. [Google Scholar]
- A. Renard, L. Novačko, K. Babojelić, and N. Kožul, “Analysis of Child Traffic Safety near Primary School Areas Using UAV Technology,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031144. [Google Scholar]
- S. Wang, Y. Zhang, and L. Sun, “Effects of personality traits on bus drivers’ prosocial and aggressive behaviours: The moderated mediating role of risk perception and gender,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 2 February, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281473. [Google Scholar]
- D. Adiyanto, B. Kurniawan, and I. Wahyuni, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Perilaku Safety Driving Pada Pengemudi Bus Rapid Transit Trans Semarang Koridor I,” J. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- S. Nurul, A. Rizqiani, and A. R. Amelia, “Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Stres Kerja Pada Sopir Akap,” J. Keperawatan Jiwa, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 775–784, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Lu, X. Fu, E. Guo, and F. Tang, “XGBoost Algorithm-Based Monitoring Model for Urban Driving Stress: Combining Driving Behaviour, Driving Environment, and Route Familiarity,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 21921–21938, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055551. [Google Scholar]
- N. Casado-Sanz, B. Guirao, A. L. Galera, and M. Attard, “Investigating the risk factors associated with the severity of the pedestrians injured on spanish crosstown roads,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 19, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11195194. [Google Scholar]
- Z. Li et al., “Examining driver injury severity in intersection-related crashes using cluster analysis and hierarchical Bayesian models,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 120, pp. 139–151, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.009. [Google Scholar]
- S. S. Yassin and Pooja, “Road accident prediction and model interpretation using a hybrid K-means and random forest algorithm approach,” SN Appl. Sci., vol. 2, no. 9, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-3125-1. [Google Scholar]
- European Transport Safety Council, “Norway wins 2025 ETSC PIN Award for outstanding road safety progress,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://etsc.eu/. [Google Scholar]
- R. Ryall and M. Sullivan-Kilgour, “Projecting the Impact of New Public Transport Networks on Mode Shift,” Open Transp. J., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.2174/18744478-v16-e221115-2022-24. [Google Scholar]
- B. Yu, S. Bao, Y. Zhang, J. Sullivan, and M. Flannagan, “Measurement and prediction of driver trust in automated vehicle technologies: An application of hand position transition probability matrix,” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., vol. 124, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102957. [Google Scholar]
- K. Theerathitichaipa, “A Structural Equation Model of the Factors Affecting the Belt and Road Initiative ( BRI ) on the Perceived Benefits and Intention of Thai People to Use the China-Laos High-Speed Rail Service,” pp. 1–22, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- L. Davis, “Finite element modelling of the thermo-mechanical properties of metal-matrix composites,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Applied Mechanics Division, AMD, vol. 212. pp. 55–69, 1995, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/0029423714. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.