Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 712, 2026
2026 16th International Conference on Future Environment and Energy (ICFEE 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Air Quality and Atmospheric Pollutant Characterization | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671202001 | |
| Published online | 19 May 2026 | |
- S. D. A. Kusumaningtyas, E. Aldrian, T. Wati, D. Atmoko, and S. Sunaryo, “The Recent State of Ambient Air Quality in Jakarta,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2343–2354, 2018, doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0391. [Google Scholar]
- M. Santoso et al., “Assessment of Urban Air Quality in Indonesia,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res., vol. 20, pp. 2142–2158, 2020, doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.09.0451. [Google Scholar]
- M. Santoso et al., “Long term characteristics of atmospheric particulate matter and compositions in Jakarta, Indonesia,” Atmospheric Pollut. Res., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2215–2225, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apr.2020.09.006. [Google Scholar]
- G. Syuhada et al., “Impacts of Air Pollution on Health and Cost of Illness in Jakarta, Indonesia.,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 20, no. 4, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042916. [Google Scholar]
- P. Lestari and Y. D. Mauliadi, “Source apportionment of particulate matter at urban mixed site in Indonesia using PMF,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1760–1770, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.044. [Google Scholar]
- R. Dhammapala, “Analysis of fine particle pollution data measured at 29 US diplomatic posts worldwide,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 213, pp. 367–376, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.070. [Google Scholar]
- C. L. Weagle et al., “Global Sources of Fine Particulate Matter: Interpretation of PM2.5 Chemical Composition Observed by SPARTAN using a Global Chemical Transport Model,” Environ. Sci. Technol., p. acs.est.8b01658, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01658. [Google Scholar]
- Y. Fujii et al., “Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols emitted from peatland fire in Riau, Sumatra, Indonesia,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 87, pp. 164–169, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.037. [Google Scholar]
- B. J. Turpin and J. J. Huntzicker, “Identification of secondary organic aerosol episodes and quantitation of primary and secondary organic aerosol concentrations during SCAQS,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 29, no. 23, pp. 3527–3544, Dec. 1995, doi: 10.1016/1352-2310(94)00276-Q. [Google Scholar]
- J. J. Cao et al., “Spatial and seasonal variations of atmospheric organic carbon and elemental carbon in Pearl River Delta Region, China,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 38, no. 27, pp. 4447–4456, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.016. [Google Scholar]
- J. C. Chow, J. G. Watson, L. C. Pritchett, W. R. Pierson, C. A. Frazier, and R. G. Purcell, “The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies,” Atmospheric Environ. Part Gen. Top., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1185–1201, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0960-1686(93)90245-T. [Google Scholar]
- W. Phairuang, M. Inerb, M. Furuuchi, M. Hata, S. Tekasakul, and P. Tekasakul, “Size- fractionated carbonaceous aerosols down to PM0. 1 in southern Thailand: Local and long- range transport effects,” Environ. Pollut., vol. 260, p. 114031, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- M. Amin et al., “A review of particulate matter (PM) in Indonesia: trends, health impact, challenges, and options,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 197, no. 1, p. 11, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-13426-z. [Google Scholar]
- W. Liu, Y. Wang, A. Russell, and E. S. Edgerton, “Atmospheric aerosol over two urban-rural pairs in the southeastern United States: Chemical composition and possible sources,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 39, no. 25, pp. 4453–4470, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.048. [Google Scholar]
- P. Choomanee, S. Bualert, T. Thongyen, S. Salao, W. W. Szymanski, and T. Rungratanaubon, “Vertical Variation of Carbonaceous Aerosols with in the PM2.5 Fraction in Bangkok, Thailand,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2020, doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.04.0192. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.