Preliminary evaluation of vacuum desorption efficiency and the influence of vacuum port configuration in a calf-20 VPSA system for CO2 capture

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 712, 2026 2026 16^th International Conference on Future Environment and Energy (ICFEE 2026)


Article Number		02006
Number of page(s)		10
Section		Air Quality and Atmospheric Pollutant Characterization
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671202006
Published online		19 May 2026

IEA, Global Energy Review (2025). CO2 Emissions in 2024 (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2025) [Google Scholar]
C.A. Grande (2012). Pressure swing adsorption after 40 years: Innovations and new applications. ISRN Chem. Eng., 2012, 673750. [Google Scholar]
P.A. Webley, A. Qader, A. Ntiamoah, J. Ling, P. Xiao, Y. Zhai (2017). CO2 capture by vacuum pressure swing adsorption (VPSA) from flue gas - Performance and cost of carbon capture. Energy Procedia, 114, 2467–2472. [Google Scholar]
J. Yu, Y. Wang (2016). Optimization of a VPSA process for CO2 capture from flue gas. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55 (11), 3060–3069. [Google Scholar]
J.-H. Lin, S. Wait, T.N. Pham, P. Halder, et al. (2021). Sustainable production of high- value carbon nanomaterials from plastic waste and biomass. Science, 374 (6574), 1464–1471. [Google Scholar]
T.T.T. Nguyen, G.K.H. Shimizu, A. Rajendran (2023). Rapid evaluation of metal-organic frameworks for post-combustion CO2 capture using a simplified VPSA cycle model. Chem. Eng. J., 452, 139550. [Google Scholar]
J.B. Siegel, H.G.W. Nevison, D.S. Sholl (2022). High-throughput screening of metal-organic frameworks for CO2 capture from flue gas using vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. J., 430, 137326. [Google Scholar]
R. Gutierrez-Ortega, N. Nomen, J. Sempere, J.B. Parra, M.A. Montes-Morán, R. Gonzalez-Olmosa (2022). Evaluation of commercial zeolites for CO2 capture from flue gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption. Chem. Eng. J., 435, 134703. [Google Scholar]
N. Henrotin, N. Heymans, M.E. Duprez, G. Mouchaham, C. Serre, D. Wong, G. De Weireld (2024). Evaluation of MOFs and zeolites for CO2 capture from flue gas by vacuum pressure swing adsorption: A comparative study. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol., 12, 100224. [Google Scholar]
S. Cavenati, C.A. Grande, A.E. Rodrigues (2004). Adsorption equilibrium of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen on zeolite 13X at high pressures. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 74, 95–104. [Google Scholar]
H. Yang, Z. Xu, M. Fan, R. Gupta, R.B. Slimane, A.E. Bland, I. Wright (2008). Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. J. Environ. Sci., 20, 14–27. [Google Scholar]
F.V.S. Lopes, C.A. Grande, A.E. Rodrigues (2011). Adsorption of H2, CO2, CH4 and CO on zeolite 13X and activated carbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50 (14), 8703–8710. [Google Scholar]
D.M. Ruthven, Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984) [Google Scholar]
Y.H. Yoon, J.H. Nelson (1984). Application of gas adsorption kinetics I. A theoretical model for respirator cartridge service life. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 45 (8), 509–516. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.