Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
Article Number 01037
Number of page(s) 7
Section Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671601037
Published online 09 June 2026
  1. P. Michalak, Thermal-Airflow Coupling in Hourly Energy Simulation of a Building with Natural Stack Ventilation, Energies 15, 4175 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15114175 [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Sarna, J. Ferdyn-Grygierek, Natural ventilation for thermal comfort: a simulation-based comparison of manual and automated window control strategies in temperate climate housing, Build. Environ. 285, 113551 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113551 [Google Scholar]
  3. D.W. Etheridge, Unsteady flow effects due to fluctuating wind pressures in natural ventilation design-mean flow rates, Build. Environ. 35, 111133 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00007-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Wang, Interaction Between Wind-driven And Buoyancy-driven Natural Ventilation, in: IBPSA, 259-266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2013.1396 [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Choi, S. Park, J. Joe, S.-I. Kim, J.-H. Jo, E.-J. Kim, Y.-H. Cho, Review of infiltration and airflow models in building energy simulations for providing guidelines to building energy modelers, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 181, 113327 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113327 [Google Scholar]
  6. M.W. Liddament, C. Allen, The Validation and Comparison of Mathematical Models of Air Infiltration, AIVC Tech. Note 11 (1983). https://www.aivc.org/resource/tn-11-validation-and-comparison-mathematical-models-air-infiltration (accessed January 6, 2026) [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Bastos Porsani, N. Casquero-Modrego, J.B. Echeverria Trueba, C. Fernàndez Bandera, Empirical evaluation of EnergyPlus infiltration model for a case study in a high-rise residential building, Energy Build. 296, 113322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113322 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Malkawi, B. Yan, Y. Chen, Z. Tong, Predicting thermal and energy performance of mixed-mode ventilation using an integrated simulation approach, Build. Simul. 9, 335-346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0271-x [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Garlet, C.A. Dias, J. O’Donnell, A.P. Melo, Enriching BIM-BEPS workflows to support natural ventilation simulations using AirflowNetwork, Energy Build. 347, 116295 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116295 [Google Scholar]
  10. W.S. Dols, S.J. Emmerich, B.J. Polidoro, Coupling the multizone airflow and contaminant transport software CONTAM with EnergyPlus using cosimulation, Build. Simul. 9, 469-479 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0279-2 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Justo Alonso, W.S. Dols, H.M. Mathisen, Using Co-simulation between EnergyPlus and CONTAM to evaluate recirculation-based, demand-controlled ventilation strategies in an office building, Build. Environ. 211, 108737 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108737 [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Khalifa, L. Gharbi Ernez, E. Znouda, C. Bouden, Coupling TRNSYS 17 and CONTAM: simulation of a naturally ventilated double-skin façade, Adv. Build. Energy Res. 9, 293-304 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2015.1050694 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Alonso, W.S. Dols, H.M. Mathisen, Using cosimulation between EnergyPlus and CONTAM to develop IAQ and energy-centric demand-controlled ventilation systems, in: Maria Alonso, William Stuart Dols, Hans M. Mathisen, Ghent, BE (2019). https://www.nist.gov/publications/using-co-simulation-between-energyplus-and-contam-develop-iaq-and-energy-centric-demand (accessed January 6, 2026) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Ferdyn-Grygierek, K. Grygierek, Towards Climate-Resilient Dwellings: A Comparative Analysis of Passive and Active Retrofit Solutions in Aging Central European Housing Stock, Energies 18, 4386 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164386 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Ferdyn-Grygierek, K. Grygierek, Ventilation Methods for Improving the Indoor Air Quality and Energy Efficiency of Multi-Family Buildings in Central Europe, Energies 17, 2232 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17092232 [Google Scholar]
  16. W.S. Dols, B.J. Polidoro, CONTAM User Guide and Program Documentation Version 3.4, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2020). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1887r1 [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Bastos Porsani, N. Casquero-Modrego, J.B. Echeverria Trueba, C. Fernandez Bandera, Empirical evaluation of EnergyPlus infiltration model for a case study in a high-rise residential building, Energy Build. 296, 113322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113322 [Google Scholar]
  18. Engineering Reference:, EnergyPlus TM, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. ASHRAE. Guideline 14-2014: Measurement of Energy and Demand Savings, ASHRAE: Atlanta, GA, USA (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. ASHRAE Handbook, Fundamentals, SI ed.; American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers: Atlanta, GA, USA (2001) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.B Dickinson, H.E. Feustel,: Seasonal variation in effective leakage area, Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA, USA (1985). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5544870 (accessed January 6, 2026) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.