EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 716 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 716 (2026) 05030 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
Article Number 05030
Number of page(s) 6
Section Health, Wellbeing, and Human Behaviors in the Built Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671605030
Published online 09 June 2026
  1. G. Amicone et al., “Green Breaks: The restorative effect of the school environment’s green areas on children’s cognitive performance,” Front. Psychol., vol. 9, no. OCT, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01579. [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Cha, “The Influence of Classroom Size and Window View on Young Children’s Executive Functions and Physiological Responses, Based on VR Technology,” Behav. Sci., vol. 13, no. 11, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/bs13110936. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Dadvand et al., “Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 112, no. 26, pp. 7937–7942, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503402112. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Finlay, M. Esposito, K.M. Langa, S. Judd, and P. Clarke, “Cognability: An Ecological Theory of neighborhoods and cognitive aging,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 309, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115220. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Jenkin, I. Frampton, M.P. White, and S. Pahl, “The relationship between exposure to natural and urban environments and children’s self-regulation,” Landsc. Res., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 315–328, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1316365. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Julvez et al., “Early life multiple exposures and child cognitive function: A multi-centric birth cohort study in six European countries,” Environ. Pollut., vol. 284, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117404. [Google Scholar]
  7. L.A. Sharam, K.M. Mayer, and O. Baumann, “Design by nature: The influence of windows on cognitive performance and affect,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 85, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101923. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Strachan-Regan and O. Baumann, “The impact of room shape on affective states, heartrate, and creative output,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 6, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28340. [Google Scholar]
  9. Environmental Protection Agency, “Report to Congress on Indoor Air Quality Indoor Air Pollution Research Needs Statement,” 1989. [Google Scholar]
  10. G.N. Bratman, G.C. Daily, B.J. Levy, and J.J. Gross, “The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition,” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 138, pp. 41–50, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.005. [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Gillis and B. Gatersleben, “A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design,” Buildings, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 948–963, 2015, doi: 10.3390/buildings5030948. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Yeom, H. Kim, and T. Hong, “Psychological and physiological effects of a green wall on occupants: A cross-over study in virtual reality,” Build. Environ., vol. 204, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108134. [Google Scholar]
  13. E.E. Scott, A.S. McDonnell, S.B. LoTemplio, B.N. Uchino, and D.L. Strayer, “Toward a unified model of stress recovery and cognitive restoration in nature,” Parks Steward. Forum, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 46–60, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Jung, D.I. Kim, and N. Kim, “Bringing nature into hospital architecture: Machine learning-based EEG analysis of the biophilia effect in virtual reality,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 89, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102033. [Google Scholar]
  15. Z. Li, W. Zhang, J. Cui, L. Wang, H. Liu, and H. Liu, “Biophilic environment with visual-olfactory stimuli contributes to psychophysiological restoration and cognitive enhancement,” Build. Environ., vol. 250, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111202. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Olszewska-Guizzo, N. Escoffier, J. Chan, and T.P. Yok, “Window view and the brain: Effects of floor level and green cover on the alpha and beta rhythms in a passive exposure eeg experiment,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 15, no. 11, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112358. [Google Scholar]
  17. J.H. Rhee, B. Schermer, and S.H. Cha, “Effects of indoor vegetation density on human well-being for a healthy built environment,” Dev. Built Environ., vol. 14, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100172. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Valentine, T. Steffert, H. Mitcheltree, and K. Steemers, “Architectural Neuroimmunology: A Pilot Study Examining the Impact of Biophilic Architectural Design on Neuroinflammation,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1292–1292, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14051292. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Yin, N. Arfaei, P. MacNaughton, P.J. Catalano, J.G. Allen, and J.D. Spengler, “Effects of biophilic interventions in office on stress reaction and cognitive function: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality,” Indoor Air, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1028–1039, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1111/ina.12593. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rachel, Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan, The experience of nature : a psychological perspective. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Kaplan, “THE RESTORATIVE BENEFITS OF NATURE: TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK,” 1995. [Google Scholar]
  22. R.S. Ulrich, “Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment,” in Behavior and the Natural Environment, I. Altman and J.F. Wohlwill, Eds., Boston, MA: Springer US, 1983, pp. 85–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4. [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Ohly et al., “Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments,” J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 305–343, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10937404.2016.1196155. [Google Scholar]
  24. H.J. Rosas, M. Hu, E. Bernat, M. Gharipour, and D. Woo, “Neuroarchitecture Evaluation of Biophilia Constructs: A Review of EEG in Biophilic Design Studies,” ARCC 2025 Conf. Proc., 2025. [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Joye, M. Köster, F. Lange, M. Fischer, and A. Moors, “A goal-discrepancy account of restorative nature experiences,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 93, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/jjenvp.2023.102192. [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Joye and S. Dewitte, “Nature’s broken path to restoration. A critical look at Attention Restoration Theory,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 59, pp. 1–8, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/jjenvp.2018.08.006. [Google Scholar]
  27. J.P. Forgas, “Affect and Cognition,” Perspect. Psychol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 94–101, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00067.x. [Google Scholar]
  28. H. Bless and K. Fiedler, “Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior,” in Affect in social thinking and behavior, Psychology Press, 2012, pp. 65–84. Accessed: Oct. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203720752-6/mood-regulation-information-processing-behavior-herbert-bless-klaus-fiedler [Google Scholar]
  29. P.C. Holland, M. Gallagher, P.C. Holland, and M. Gallagher, “Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes,” Trends Cogn. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 65–73, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Goldstein et al., “Neural substrates of the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and motor inhibitory control: an emotional linguistic go/no-go fMRI study,” Neuroimage, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1026–1040, 2007. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.