EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 716 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 716 (2026) 10004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
Article Number 10004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience, and Environmental Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671610004
Published online 09 June 2026
  1. WMO, Weather-related disasters increase over past 50 years, causing more damage but fewer deaths. https://wmo.int/media/news/weather-related-disasters-increase-over-past-50-years-causing-more-damage-fewer-deaths. [Google Scholar]
  2. CRED, 2024 disasters in numbers (CRED, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Saulo, A decade of the Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction and the imperative of enhanced resilience. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 16, 4 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  4. NCEI, U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters, 1980-present. https://doi.org/10.25921/STKW-7W73. [Google Scholar]
  5. NCEI, Texas has the most billion-dollar disasters nationwide. https://texas2036.org/posts/texas-has-the-most-billion-dollar-disasters-nationwide/. [Google Scholar]
  6. T.L. Sheldon, C. Zhan, The impact of natural disasters on U.S. home ownership. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6, 1169 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Zhao, A.P. McCoy, J. Smoke, Resilient built environment: New framework for assessing the residential construction market. J. Archit. Eng. 21, 1 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Caldera, C. Jayarathna, C. Desha, Disaster waste management for resilient communities: A systematic literature review. Clean. Waste Syst. 12, 100333 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Naderi, K.Z. Benis, M. Dowlati, H. Seyedin, A. Behnami, M. Farzadkia, Identifying methods and challenges of waste management in natural disasters. J. Environ. Manage. 373, 123514 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  10. C. De Wolf, S. Çetin, N.M.P. Bocken (eds.), A circular built environment in the digital age (Springer Int. Publ., Cham, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N.M.P. Bocken, E.J. Hultink, The circular economy - A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 143, 757 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Askar, A.L. Rodrigues, L. Bragança, D. Pinheiro, From temporary to permanent: A circular approach for post-disaster housing reconstruction. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 225, 012032 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Byers, D. Bompa, Q. Jin, C. De Wolf, A. Bendiek-Laranjo, Circular economy for post-hazard infrastructure restoration: Strategies for resilience and resource efficiency. Sustainability 1, 1 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Çetin, J. Kirchherr, The build back circular framework: Circular economy strategies for post- disaster reconstruction and recovery. Circ. Econ. Sust. 5, 1689 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Karimi, S. Shirowzhan, S.M.E. Sepasgozar, Architectural design criteria considering the circular economy and buildability for smart disaster relief shelter prototyping. Buildings (2023). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Parsaee, T. Abazari, W. Bedwell, M. Goodarzi, E. Harvey, Circular economy in disaster recovery: Life cycle approaches to debris. CIB Conf. 1, 1 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Pradhananga, M. ElZomor, Revamping sustainability efforts post-disaster by adopting circular economy resilience practices. Sustainability 15, 15870 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Jalloul, J. Choi, N. Yesiller, D. Manheim, S. Derrible, A systematic approach to identify, characterize, and prioritize the data needs for quantitative sustainable disaster debris management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 180, 106174 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Rathnasinghe, A. Rahubadda, N. Thurairajah, U. Kulatunga, Beyond efficiency: Rethinking off-site construction for post-disaster housing reconstruction, in Proc. 13th World Constr. Symp., (2025). [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Snyder, Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 104, 333 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, T.P. Group, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Bektaş, Z. Jingjie, Sustainable waste management strategies for earthquake debris: Lessons from the 2008 China and 2023 Türkiye-Syria disasters. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 116, 105153 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Xiao, Y. Lu, J. Yu, M. Yu, X. Xiao, S.P. Shah, Post-earthquake construction waste reuse: Advancing green reconstruction and sustainability. Low-Carbon Mater. Green Constr. (2025). [Google Scholar]
  24. Y.A. Fatimah, R. Murniningsih, A. Setiawan, M. Aman, A smart sustainable approach for waste management in post-natural disaster phase. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 674, 012042 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  25. T. Shevchenko, S. Çetin, B. Yannou, J. Kirchherr, M. Saidani, A dual circular strategies hierarchy as a guiding framework for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction: Focus on Ukraine. J. Clean. Prod. 524, 146478 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Moreno-Sierra, M. Pieschacon, A. Khan, The use of recycled plastics for the design of a thermal resilient emergency shelter prototype. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 50, 101885 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. M.V. Arnetoli, R. Bologna, Design scenarios for a circular vision of post-disaster temporary settlements. Urban Book Ser. (2023). [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Montalbano, G. Santi, Sustainability of temporary housing in post-disaster scenarios: A requirementbased design strategy. Buildings 13, 2952 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  29. X.-T. Feng, B.-J. He, Sustainability vision for low- carbon, comfortable, inclusive, and recyclable temporary buildings. Energy Build. 328, 115213 (2025). methodology: An overview and guidelines, Journal of Business Research 104, 333 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, and T.P. Group, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement, PLOS Medicine 6, e1000097 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. N. Bektaş and Z. Jingjie, Sustainable waste management strategies for earthquake debris: Lessons from the 2008 China and 2023 Türkiye- Syria disasters, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 116, 105153 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Xiao, Y. Lu, J. Yu, M. Yu, X. Xiao, and S.P. Shah, Post-earthquake construction waste reuse: advancing green reconstruction and sustainability, Low-Carbon Materials and Green Construction (2025). [Google Scholar]
  33. Y.A. Fatimah, R. Murniningsih, A. Setiawan, and M. Aman, A Smart Sustainable approach for waste management in post-natural disaster phase, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 674, 012042 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  34. T. Shevchenko, S. Çetin, B. Yannou, J. Kirchherr, and M. Saidani, A dual circular strategies hierarchy as a guiding framework for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction: Focus on Ukraine, Journal of Cleaner Production 524, 146478 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Moreno-Sierra, M. Pieschacon, and A. Khan, The use of recycled plastics for the design of a thermal resilient emergency shelter prototype, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 50, 101885 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  36. M.V. Arnetoli and R. Bologna, Design Scenarios for a Circular Vision of Post-disaster Temporary Settlements | SpringerLink, Technological Imagination in the Green and Digital Transition, The Urban Book Series (2023). [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Montalbano and G. Santi, Sustainability of Temporary Housing in Post-Disaster Scenarios: A Requirement-Based Design Strategy, BUILDINGS-BASEL 13, 2952 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  38. X.-T. Feng and B.-J. He, Sustainability vision for low-carbon, comfortable, inclusive, and recyclable temporary buildings, Energy and Buildings 328, 115213 (2025). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.