EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 716 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 716 (2026) 10014 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
Article Number 10014
Number of page(s) 7
Section Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience, and Environmental Policy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671610014
Published online 09 June 2026
  1. W. Chen, Zhou, Yuyu, Stokes, Eleanor C., and X. Zhang, “Large-scale urban building function mapping by integrating multi-source web-based geospatial data,” Geo-spatial Information Science, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1785–1799, Nov.2024, doi: 10.1080/10095020.2023.2264342. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Ferrando, F. Causone, T. Hong, and Y. Chen, “Urban building energy modeling (UBEM) tools: A state-of-the-art review of bottom-up physicsbased approaches,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 62, p. 102408, Nov.2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102408. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Eggimann, N. Vulic, M. Rüdisüli, R. Mutschler, K. Orehounig, and M. Sulzer, “Spatiotemporal upscaling errors of building stock clustering for energy demand simulation,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 258, p. 111844, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111844. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Cerezo, J. Sokol, S. AlKhaled, C. Reinhart, A. Al-Mumin, and A. Hajiah, “Comparison of four building archetype characterization methods in urban building energy modeling (UBEM): A residential case study in Kuwait City,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 154, pp. 321–334, Nov.2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.029. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Shen and H. Wang, “Archetype building energy modeling approaches and applications: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 199, p. 114478, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114478. [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Dahlström, F. Johari, T. Broström, and J. Widén, “Identification of representative building archetypes: A novel approach using multiparameter cluster analysis applied to the Swedish residential building stock,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 303, p. 113823, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113823. [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Ghiassi and A. Mahdavi, “Reductive bottom-up urban energy computing supported by multivariate cluster analysis,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 144, pp. 372–386, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.004. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Wolk and C. Reinhart, “Semantic building energy modeling: Analysis across geospatial scales,” Building and Environment, vol. 276, p. 112883, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112883. [Google Scholar]
  9. K.R. Newton and Z. Shi, “A generalizable framework for urban building energy model archetype generation using k-prototypes mixeddata clustering,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 3140, no. 6, p. 062026, Nov.2025, doi: 10.1088/17426596/3140/6/062026. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ö. Akay and G. Yüksel, “Clustering the mixed panel dataset using Gower’s distance and k- prototypes algorithms,” Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3031–3041, Nov.2018, doi: 10.1080/03610918.2017.1367806. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Fleischmann, K. Samardzhiev, A. Brazdova, D. Dancejova, and L. Winkler, “The Hierarchical Morphotope Classification: A Theory-Driven Framework for Large-Scale Analysis of Built Form,” Sep. 12, 2025, arXiv : arXiv:2509.10083. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.10083. [Google Scholar]
  12. Microsoft Planetary Computer, “Microsoft Building Footprints.” [Online]. Available: https://planetarycomputer.microsoft.com/datasetZms-buildings [Google Scholar]
  13. “TxGIO DataHub,” Bexar & Travis Counties Lidar | 2021. [Online]. Available: https://data.geographic.texas.gov/collection/?c=447db89a-58ee-4a1b-a61f-b918af2fb0bb [Google Scholar]
  14. “Bexar Appraisal District - Official Site.” [Online]. Available: https://bcad.org/ [Google Scholar]
  15. “City of San Antonio Open Data.” Accessed: Jan. 06, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://opendata-cosagis.opendata.arcgis.com/search?collection=dataset [Google Scholar]
  16. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. and Vickrey & Associates, Inc, “Component 1: Land and Development Capacity Study. Comprehensive Plan Initial Studies - Final Report,” City of San Antonio, Department of Planning & Community Development, San Antonio, TX, Nov.2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.sanantonio.gov/Portals/0/Files/Planning/SA%20Tomorrow/Comprehensive%20Plan_Initial%20Studies_Component%201_Land%20and%20Development%20Capacity%20Study_Final%20Report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Alrasheed and M. Mourshed, “Building stock modelling using k-prototype: A framework for representative archetype development,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 311, p. 114111, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114111. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y.Q. Ang, Z. Berzolla, and C. Reinhart, “Smart meter-based archetypes for socioeconomically sensitive urban building energy modeling,” Building and Environment, vol. 246, p. 110991, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110991. [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Xiao, F. Khayatian, and G. Dall, “Unsupervised learning for feature projection: Extracting patterns from multidimensional building measurements,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 224, p. 110228, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110228. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.