EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 722 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 722 (2026) 05002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 722, 2026
Colloque International DEVPORT 2026 – 5th edition “Ports and Maritime Transport in Transitions: Territories and Challenges”
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Green Shipping & Environmental Port Governance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202672205002
Published online 03 July 2026
  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. [Google Scholar]
  2. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2015). Paris Agreement. [Google Scholar]
  3. Acciaro, M., Vanelslander, T., Sys, C., Ferrari, C., Roumboutsos, A., Giuliano, G., & Kapros, S. Environmental sustainability in seaports: A framework for successful innovation. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(5), 480–500 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.932926 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Notteboom, T., & Haralambides, H. Port management and governance in a post- COVID-19 era. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 22(3), 329–352 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00162-7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alzahrani, A., Zis, T., & Kim, S. Energy management and emissions reduction strategies for ports: A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102807 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100727 [Google Scholar]
  6. International Maritime Organization. (2020). Fourth IMO greenhouse gas study. [Google Scholar]
  7. International Maritime Organization. (2018). Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships. [Google Scholar]
  8. Psaraftis, H.N. Speed optimization vs speed reduction: The choice between speed limits and a bunker levy. Sustainability, 11(8), 2249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082249 [Google Scholar]
  9. Buonomano, A., Del Papa, G., Giuzio, G.F., Palombo, A., & Russo, G. Future pathways for decarbonization and energy efficiency of ports: Modelling and optimization as sustainable energy hubs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, 138389 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138389 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouman, E.A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A.I., & Stromman, A.H. State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408–421 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindstad, E., Eskeland, G.S., Rialland, A., & Valland, A. Decarbonizing maritime transport: The importance of engine technology and regulations. Energy Policy, 113, 274–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218793 [Google Scholar]
  12. Stopford, M. Maritime economics (3rd ed.). (Routledge, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  13. Geerlings, H., Heij, C., & Van Duin, R. Opportunities for improving energy efficiency in ports. Energy Policy, 104, 359–369 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184952 [Google Scholar]
  14. Acciaro, M. Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(3), 291–311 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1027150 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lam, J.S.L., & Notteboom, T. The greening of ports: A comparison of port management tools used by leading ports in Asia and Europe. Transport Reviews, 34(2), 169–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.891162 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Puig, M., Wooldridge, C., Darbra, R.M., & Iannaccone, S. Identification and selection of environmental performance indicators for sustainable port development. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 119(1), 17–26 (2017). https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cariou, P. Is slow steaming a sustainable means of reducing CO2 emissions from container shipping? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 260–264 (2011). https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, H., & Styhre, L. Increased energy efficiency in short sea shipping through decreased time in port. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 167–178 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.11.008 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kitzinger, J. Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. (BMJ, 311, 299–302, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  20. Morgan, D.L. Focus groups as qualitative research. (Sage, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  21. Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. (Sage, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  22. Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. Interviewing experts. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Weick, K.E. Sensemaking in organizations. (Sage, 1995). [Google Scholar]
  25. Balcombe, P., Brierley, J., Lewis, C., Skatvedt, L., Speirs, J., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. How to decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72–88, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.