EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 728 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 728 (2026) 02014 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 728, 2026
2026 3rd International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2026)
Article Number 02014
Number of page(s) 9
Section Civil Engineering and Urban Planning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202672802014
Published online 27 July 2026
  1. A. Guterres, Secretary-General’s opening remarks at press conference on climate, UN press release (New York, 2023) https://press.un.org/en/2023/sgsm21893.doc.htm [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkeley Earth, Global temperature report for 2023 (Berkeley Earth, Berkeley, CA, 2024) https://berkeleyearth.org/global-temperature-report-for-2023/ [Google Scholar]
  3. United Nations DESA, World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision (United Nations, New York, 2018) https://population.un.org/wup/assets/WUP2018-Report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. C.S. Holling, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Cheshmehzangi, S. Ghosh, S. Majumdar (Eds.), Cities of tomorrow: urban resilience and climate change preparedness (Springer, Singapore, 2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9658-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.G. Xu et al., Smart city planning methods: spatial analysis models in an adaptive perspective (Southeast Univ. Press, Nanjing, 2016) [in Chinese] ISBN:9787564152086 [Google Scholar]
  7. J.H. Holland, Daedalus 121 (1), 17 (1992) https://www.jstor.org/stable/20025416 [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Walker, C.S. Holling, S.R. Carpenter, A. Kinzig, Ecol. Soc. 9 (2), 5 (2004) https://www.jstor.org/stable/i20025412 [Google Scholar]
  9. S.L. Cutter, K.D. Ash, C.T. Emrich, Glob. Environ. Change 29, 65 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. B.E. Flanagan, E.W. Gregory, E.J. Hallisey, J.L. Heitgerd, B. Lewis, J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 8 (1), 3 (2011) DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1792 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Cheshmehzangi, Urban health, sustainability, and peace in the day the world stopped (Springer, Singapore, 2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4888-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Taheri, A. Shabani, H. Badland, A. Sharifi, A. Cheshmehzangi, Cities Health (2026), doi:10.1080/23748834.2026.2616967 [Google Scholar]
  13. L.D. Frank, M.A. Andresen, T.L. Schmid, Am. J. Prev. Med. 27 (2), 87 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  14. UN-Habitat, SDG indicator 11.1.1 metadata (UNHabitat, Nairobi, 2024) https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/ [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Boeing, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65, 126 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004. [Google Scholar]
  16. A.A. Ganin, M. Kitsak, D. Marchese, J.M. Keisler, T. Seager, I. Linkov, Sci. Adv. 3 (12), e1701079 (2017) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.08072 [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Buhl et al., Eur. Phys. J. B 49 (4), 513 (2006) DOI:10.1140/epjb/e2006-00085-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. WorldPop, Global 100 m unconstrained population grid (Univ. Southampton, 2020), doi:10.5258/SOTON/WP00646 [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Moreno et al., Smart Cities 4 (1), 93 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Zanaga et al., ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100 (ESA, 2021), doi:10.5281/zenodo.5571936 [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Didan, MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250 m SIN Grid V061 (NASA LP DAAC, 2021), doi:10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.061 [Google Scholar]
  22. INFORM, Subnational Risk Index methodology (DRMKC, European Commission JRC, 2024) https://drmkc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/inform-index/INFORM-Risk/Methodology [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Roper, D. Casagrande, Front. Hum. Dyn. 7, 1615833 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1615833 [Google Scholar]
  24. N.E. Coulson, S.J. McCoy, I.K. McDonough, Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 85, 103581 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103581 [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Lodi, G. Marin, M. Modica, J. Environ. Manage. 332, 117352 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117352 [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Oldenburg, The great good place (Paragon House, New York, 1989) https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9561417 [Google Scholar]
  27. D.P. Aldrich, Jpn. J. Polit. Sci. 24 (1), 30 (2023) doi:10.1017/S1468109922000366 [Google Scholar]
  28. UNESCO, Living heritage and the COVID-19 pandemic (UNESCO ICH Section, Paris, 2021) https://ich.unesco.org/en/living-heritage-and-the-covid-19-pandemic-01179 [Google Scholar]
  29. D.P. Aldrich, M.A. Meyer, Am. Behav. Sci. 59 (2), 254 (2015) doi:10.1177/0002764214550299 [Google Scholar]
  30. SAMR &SAC, Ecosystem assessment—Technical guidelines for terrestrial gross ecosystem product accounting, GB/T 46869-2025 (Beijing, 2025) https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/std/newGbInfo?hcno=C1F1C28ADBFD8337DE86C70BD1480613 [Google Scholar]
  31. Z. Ouyang et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (25), 14593 (2020) doi:10.1073/pnas.1911439117 [Google Scholar]
  32. T. Elmqvist, H. Setälä, S.N. Handel et al., Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 101 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Folke, S.R. Carpenter, B. Walker et al., Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 557 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. CNN Editorial Research, Hurricane Katrina statistics fast facts (CNN, 2025) https://edition.cnn.com/weather/hurricane-katrina-statistics-fast-facts [Google Scholar]
  35. R.W. Kates, C.E. Colten, S. Laska, S.P. Leatherman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (40), 14653 (2006) http://www.jstor.org/stable/20868629 [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Tierney, The social roots of risk: producing disasters, promoting resilience (Stanford Business Books, Stanford, 2014) ISBN: 9780804791403 [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Fussell, Am. Behav. Sci. 59 (10), 1231 (2015) doi:10.1177/0002764215591181 [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Plyer, Facts for features: Katrina impact (The Data Center, New Orleans, 2016) https://www.datacenterresearch.org/data-resources/katrina/facts-for-impact/ [Google Scholar]
  39. U.S. Census Bureau, QuickFacts: Orleans Parish, Louisiana (U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 2026), https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/orleansparishlouisiana [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Deryugina, L. Kawano, S. Levitt, Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 10 (2), 202 (2018) DOI: 10.1257/app.20160307 [Google Scholar]
  41. D.P. Aldrich, Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2012) ISBN: 9780226012872 [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Huang, Y. Du, J. Yi et al., Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 144, 104910 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104910 [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Walton, Renewable Energy World, 11 Sept. 2015, https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/energy-business/10-years-after-remembering-how-entergy-new-orleans-survived-hurricane-katrina/ [Google Scholar]
  44. Phones still out after Katrina, Sun Journal (Lewiston, Maine), 20 June 2006, https://www.sunjournal.com/2006/06/20/phones-still-katrina/ [Google Scholar]
  45. X. Guo, J. Cheng, C. Yin et al., Cities 134, 104168 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104168 [Google Scholar]
  46. Z. Tao, L. Han, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (1), 488 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010488 [Google Scholar]
  47. National Development and Reform Commission, Overall plan for post-disaster reconstruction following the Henan floods (NDRC, Beijing, 2022) [in Chinese] https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/202203/t20220314_1319221.html [Google Scholar]
  48. J. Dai, C. Ji, B. Chen, Chin. J. Commun. (2024), doi:10.1080/17544750.2024.2383880 [Google Scholar]
  49. S. Lyu, G. Gao et al., Water 15 (15), 2848 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152848 [Google Scholar]
  50. T. Liu, X. Ni, J. Sun, Z. Peng, in Proc. 21st Int. ISCRAM Conf. (Münster, 2024) https://doi.org/10.59297/vzyqpk83 [Google Scholar]
  51. L. Zhao, Y. Jin, L. Zhou et al., Front. Public Health 10, 1081068 (2023) doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1081068 [Google Scholar]
  52. S. Chen, Z. Zhang, J. Yang et al., Lancet 395 (10232), 1305 (2020) doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30744-3 [Google Scholar]
  53. X. Chen, R. Quan, Nat. Hazards 106 (1), 829 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9 [Google Scholar]
  54. D. Niu, L. Wang, W. Li, Y. Ma, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (21), 14458 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114458 [Google Scholar]
  55. S. Afrin, F.J. Chowdhury, M.M. Rahman, Front. Sustain. Cities 3, 668263 (2021) doi:10.3389/frsc.2021.668263 [Google Scholar]
  56. E. Cavallo, A. Powell, O. Becerra, Estimating the Direct Economic Damage of the Earthquake in Haiti, (IDB, 2010) https://doi.org/10.18235/0010926 [Google Scholar]
  57. Disasters Emergency Committee, 2010 Haiti earthquake facts and figures, https://www.dec.org.uk/article/2010-haiti-earthquake-facts-and-figures [Google Scholar]
  58. National Institute of Building Sciences, Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2019 report (Multihazard Mitigation Council, Washington DC, 2019) https://nibs.org/projects/natural-hazard-mitigation-saves-2019-report/ [Google Scholar]
  59. S. Hallegatte, J. Rentschler, J. Rozenberg, Lifelines: the resilient infrastructure opportunity (World Bank, Washington DC, 2019) doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1430-3 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.