EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 03019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 03019
Number of page(s) 8
Section Constitutive, Numerical, and Machine Learning Models
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673003019
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. T. Ornthammarath, P. Warnitchai, Y. Maruyama, Correction: far-field ground motion characteristics of the Bangkok basin, Thailand. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 23, 6577–6602 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02295-7 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Likitlersuang, P. Plengsiri, L.Z. Mase, W. Tanapalungkorn, Influence of spatial variability of ground on seismic response analysis: a case study of Bangkok subsoils. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 79, 39 – 51 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01560-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. H.B. Seed, M.P. Romo, J.I. Sun, A. Jaime, J. Lysmer, The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985 – relationships between soil conditions and earthquake ground motions. Earthq. Spectra. 4, 687 – 729 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585498 [Google Scholar]
  4. J.M. Mayoral, D. Asimaki, S. Tepalcapa, C. Wood, A. R. Sancha, T Hutchinson, Site effects in Mexico City basin: past and present. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 121, 369–382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.028 [Google Scholar]
  5. L.Z. Mase, S. Likitlersuang, T. Tobita, Ground motion parameters and resonance effect during strong earthquake in northern Thailand. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 39, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01619-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. L.Z. Mase, S. Likitlersuang, T. Tobita, Analysis of seismic ground response caused during strong earthquake in northern Thailand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 114, 113–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Tanapalungkorn, L.Z. Mase, P. Latcharote, S. Likitlersuang, Verification of attenuation models based on strong ground motion data in northern Thailand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 133, 106145 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106145 [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Nutalaya, J.L. Rau JL, Structural framework of the Chao Phraya Basin. In: Thailand proc. of the symposium of Cenozoic basins. Chaing Mai University, Thailand (1984), 106–129 [Google Scholar]
  9. M.F. Qodri, L.Z. Mase, S. Likitlersuang, Non-linear site response analysis of Bangkok subsoils due to earthquakes triggered by Three Pagodas Faults. Eng. J. 25, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2021.25.1.43 [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Ornthammarath, P. Warnitchai, K. Worakanchana, S. Zaman, R. Sigbjörnsson, C.G. Lai, Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Thailand. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 9, 367–394 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9197-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. T.S. Nguyen, K. Ngamcharoen, S. Likitlersuang, Statistical characterisation of the geotechnical properties of Bangkok subsoil. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 41, 3 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02390-z [Google Scholar]
  12. DPT 1301/1302-61 Earthquake resistant design code DPT 1301/1302-61. Department of Public Works and Town &Country Planning, Ministry of Interior, Bangkok, Thailand (in Thai) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Poovarodom, A. Jirasakjamroonsri, Seismic site effects of soil amplifications in Bangkok. Sci. Tech. Asia. 21, 3 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Pananont, B. Wechbunthung, P. Putthapiban, D. Wattanadilokkul, Seismic activities in Kanchanaburi: past and present. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 33, 355–364 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. L.Z. Mase, S. Likitlersuang, T. Tobita, Verification of liquefaction potential during the strong earthquake at the border of Thailand-Myanmar. J. Earthq Eng. 26, 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1751346 [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Pailoplee, P. Charusiri, Seismic hazards in Thailand: a compilation and updated probabilistic analysis. Earth Planets Space. 68, 98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0465-6 [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Shahzada, U.A. Noor, Z.D. Xu, In the wake of the March 28, 2025 Myanmar Earthquake: A Detailed Examination. J. Dyn. Disasters. 1, 100017 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdd.2025.100017 [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Pintusorachai, W. Tanapalungkorn, S. Likitlersuang, Enhancing 3D geological and geotechnical engineering model of Bangkok subsoil using optimal deep neural network models. Environ. Earth. Sci. 83, 644 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11942-2 [Google Scholar]
  19. S.L. Kramer, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering (Pearson New International Ed, Essex, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  20. D.R. Groholski, Y.M.A. Hashash, M. Musgrove, J. Harmon, B. Kim, Evaluation of 1-D non-linear site response analysis using a general quadratic/hyperbolic strength-controlled constitutive model, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (6ICEGE), Christchurch, New Zealand, November 1-4 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  21. A.S.M.F. Hossain, A. Saeidi, M. Salsabili, M. Nastev, J.R. Suescun, Z. Bayati, A review of parameters and methods for seismic site response. Geosci. J. 15, 128 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15040128 [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Huang, D. McCallen, Applicability of 1D site response analysis to shallow sedimentary basins: a critical evaluation through physic-based 3D ground motion simulations. Earthq. Eng. Sruct. Dyn. 53, 2876–2907 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4142 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Vucetic, R. Dobry, Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J. Geotech. Eng. 117, 89–107 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89) [Google Scholar]
  24. H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses, Report No. EERC 70‐ 10, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley (1970) [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Hatanaka, A. Uchida, Empirical correlation between penetration resistance and internal friction angle of sandy soils. Soils Found. 36, 1–9 (1996) https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.4_1 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Youwai, K. Wongsala, Predicting the friction angle of Bangkok sand using state parameter and neural network. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 42, 5947–5965 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-02873-7 [Google Scholar]
  27. K. Warnitchai, C. Sangarayakul, S.L. Ashford, Seismic hazard in Bangkok due to distant earthquakes, in Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January 30–February 4 (2000), 1142 [Google Scholar]
  28. L.Z. Mase, W. Tanapalungkorn, P. Plengsiri, K. Ngamcharoen, S. Likitlersuang, Subsoil variability in the Bangkok metropolitan area of Thailand identified through ambient noise measurement. Indones. J. Geosci. 10, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.10.1.1-13 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.