Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03020 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Constitutive, Numerical, and Machine Learning Models | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673003020 | |
| Published online | 03 August 2026 | |
- L. Shano, T. K. Raghuvanshi, M. Meten, Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques – a review. Geoenviron. Disasters 7, 18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-020-00152-0 [Google Scholar]
- A. Carrara, M. Cardinali, R. Detti, F. Guzzetti, V. Pasqui, P. Reichenbach, GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 16, 427–445 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290160505 [Google Scholar]
- N. Perilli, M. Lombardi, N. Squeglia, S. Stacul, S. Pagliara, Bridging gaps in landslide mapping: A semi-quantitative empirical framework for delineating key areas to improve collection of essential field-based and supplementary remote-based data. Infrastructures 11(1), 11 (2026). https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11010011 [Google Scholar]
- H. J. Park, J. H. Lee, A review of quantitative landslide susceptibility analysis methods using physically based modelling. J. Eng. Geol. 32(1), 27–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.9720/KSEG.2022.1.027 [Google Scholar]
- A. A. Shahri, J. Spross, F. Johansson, S. Larsson, Landslide susceptibility hazard map in southwest of Sweden using artificial neural network. CATENA 183, 104225 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104225 [Google Scholar]
- T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed., Springer New York, NY, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 [Google Scholar]
- A. P. Bradley, The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7), 1145–1159 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2 [Google Scholar]
- M. Kuhn, K. Johnson, Applied predictive modeling. Springer Science+Business Media, Springer Nature, New York, NY, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 [Google Scholar]
- D. M. W. Powers, Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1):37–63 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- H. Agrell, The quaternary of Sweden. Sveriges geologiska undersökning, Rep. CNR770 (1979). https://resource.sgu.se/dokument/publikation/c/c770rapport/c770-rapport.pdf [Google Scholar]
- F. Guzzetti, A. Carrara, M. Cardinali, P. Reichenbach, Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study. Geomorphology, 31, 181–216, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Reichenbach, M. Rossi, B. D. Malamud, M. Mihir, F. Guzzetti, A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models. Earth-Science Reviews, 180, 60–91 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]
- SOU, Sweden facing climate change—threats and opportunities. Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2007:60 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- A. Ghaderi, A. A. Abbaszadeh Shahri, S. Larsson, A visualized hybrid intelligent model to delineate Swedish fine-grained soil layers using clay sensitivity. CATENA 214, 106289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106289 [Google Scholar]
- A. A. Shahri, A. Malemir, C. Juhlin, Soil classification analysis based on piezocone penetration test data—A case study from a quick-clay landslide site in southwestern Sweden. Eng. Geol. 189, 32–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.01.022 [Google Scholar]
- H. Löfroth, G. Göransson, J. Hedfors, K. Bergdahl, L. V. Well, Developing a methodology for characterizing cascading natural hazards associated with landslide risk in Sweden. Nat. Hazards 121, 22915–22933 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07706-1 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.