Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Infrastructure Performance and Monitoring
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673005003
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. Q. Gu, C. Zhao, X. Bian, J. P. Morrissey, J. Y. Ooi, Trackbed settlement and associated ballast degradation due to repeated train moving loads, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 153, 107109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107109 [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Chen, B. Indraratna, J. S. Vinod et al., Stress– dilatancy behaviour of fouled ballast: experiments and DEM modelling, Granul. Matter, 23, 90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-021-01150-1 [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Lenart, A. M. Kaynia, Dynamic properties of lightweight foamed glass and their effect on railway vibration, Transp. Geotech., 21, 100276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100276 [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Lenart, S. R. Karumanchi, Deformation properties and performance evaluation of reused ballast with waste tire-derived aggregates, Transp. Geotech., 52, 101586 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101586 [Google Scholar]
  5. D.-S. Xu, H.-B. Liu, R. Rui, Y. Gao, Cyclic and postcyclic simple shear behavior of binary sand–gravel mixtures with various gravel contents, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 123, 230–241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.030 [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Jia, V. Markine, Y. Guo, G. Jing, Experimental and numerical investigations on the shear behaviour of recycled railway ballast, Constr. Build. Mater., 217, 310–320 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.020 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. S. J. Suiker, E. T. Selig, R. Frenkel, Static and cyclic triaxial testing of ballast and subballast, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131, 771–782 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:6(771) [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Angelidakis, K. Boschi, K. Brzeziński et al., YADE – an extensible framework for the interactive simulation of multiscale, multiphase, and multiphysics particulate systems, Comput. Phys. Commun., 304, 109293 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109293 [Google Scholar]
  9. NEN-EN 13450:2003+C1:2006, Toeslagmaterialen voor spoorwegballast. https://www.nen.nl/nen-en-13450-2003-c1-2006-nl-128804 [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Angelidakis, S. Nadimi, M. Otsubo, S. Utili, CLUMP: a code library to generate universal multi-sphere particles, SoftwareX, 15, 100735 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2021.100735 [Google Scholar]
  11. P. A. Cundall, O. D. L. Strack, A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies, Géotechnique, 29, 47–65 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  12. S. S. Kumar, A. M. Krishna, A. Dey, Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 99, 157–167 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Thornton, Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media, Géotechnique, 50, 43–53 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.43 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. E. Scheidegger, On the statistics of the orientation of bedding planes, grain axes, and similar sedimentological data, USGS PP, 525.C, 164–167 (1963). https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/0525c/report.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. N. H. Woodcock, Specification of fabric shapes using an eigenvalue method, GSA bulletin, 88 (9), 1231–1236 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1977)88<1231:SOFSUA>2.0.CO;2 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.