| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 109, 2019
International Conference Essays of Mining Science and Practice
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00032 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910900032 | |
| Published online | 09 July 2019 | |
New methodical approaches to justify selection explosive for destruction of solid rocks
1
Institute of Geotechnical Mechanics named by N. Poljakov of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 49005, Dnipro, Simferopolska Str., 2a, Ukraine
2
National TU Dnipro Polytechnic, 49005, Dnipro, Yavornytskoho Ave., 19, Ukraine
* Corresponding author: ishenko_k@i.ua
The article developed a mathematical model to justify selection the type of explosive for destruction of solid rocks. The problem is solved using the analytical hierarchy method (AHM). In the process, many criteria, both quantitative and qualitative, were considered, their importance in selecting the type of explosives and their consistency with the opinions of experts. The following indicators were used as criteria: technological, economic, social, environmental, etc. According to the results, priority vectors were obtained for each hierarchy, which contributed to a reasonable approach to selection type of explosives. The established priorities made it possible to carry out a systematic approach to solve the problem, considering not only technological advantages, but also the costs of using various types of explosives. The factors characterizing the costs in the formation of well charges with various types of explosives are also considered. The results of mathematical modeling showed the adequacy of chosen model for selection of alternative types of explosives for the destruction of solid rocks of complex structure.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2019
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.