E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 20202nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
|Number of page(s)
|Minisymposium: Low Carbon Geotechnical Engineering (organized by Alessandro Tarantino, Enrique Romero, and Alessio Ferrari)
|18 November 2020
Suction as an untapped natural soil reinforcement to reduce embodied carbon in geotechnical structures: the case study of flood embankments in Hamburg area
1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
2 Kempfert Geotechnik GmbH, Hamburg Germany
* Corresponding author: firstname.lastname@example.org
The commitment to cut CO2 emissions is now becoming a matter of legal obligations in several countries worldwide and the construction industry, one of the main sectors contributing to carbon emissions, is required to develop new approaches for carbon-efficient design. A study was undertaken to examine whether the inclusion of negative pore-water pressures (or ‘suction’) in the design of a flood embankment could reduce the embodied carbon associate with the construction of a new embankment or the retrofitting of an existing one. The case considered here are the embankments of the tidal Elbe area in Germany that require to be raised because of the new projection of extreme river levels due to climate change. Simple uncoupled water flow and stability analyses were considered to examine the performance of given embankment geometry. The purpose of the study is to examine whether incorporating suction into the design could allow for steeper landside slopes of the flood embankment. This would allow raising the embankment by saving considerable material and, hence, reducing the embodied carbon. At the same time, this would reduce the footprint of the raised embankment, which is a design requirement when flood embankments are embedded in the built environment as it happens in Hamburg.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.