Comparing the thermal performance of Living Lab monitoring and simulation with different level of input detail

¹ Smart Energy Division, ENEA-Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Rome, Italy, michele.zinzi@enea.it
² Department of Architecture and Design, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy, giacomo.chiesa@polito.it

^* Corresponding author: michele.zinzi@enea.it

Abstract

Dynamic envelope solutions are critical to achieve comfort conditions minimizing the need of active air conditioning systems, emphasizing the potential of thermal adaption of the building occupants. Dynamic systems are, however, difficult to be implemented in European building energy certification schemes, based on semi-stationary calculation method, standard uses and reference boundary conditions. In the attempt to develop a flexible and dynamic method able to reduce the performance gap between real and expected performance, this paper presents the comparison between measurements and simulations of a Living Lab office operated in thermal free floating, with different strategies for the solar protection and the night ventilative cooling. Simulations were performed using the dynamic platform PREDYCE, which allows for manipulating monitored and simulated data. The first phase was dedicated to the model calibration using the indoor air temperature as relevant indicator against monitored data. The coefficient of variation of the root mean squared error is in the 8-9% range. Building simulations of the calibrated model demonstrated a large variation of the results as a function of the input data, with increase of discomfort hour up to a factor 20 and a reduction of discomfort hours up to 95%.