| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 447, 2023
The 15th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 15th AIWEST-DR 2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 04004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Disaster Society, Culture and History | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344704004 | |
| Published online | 13 November 2023 | |
Content Validity of Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Natural Disasters Based on Aceh Local Wisdom
1 Graduate Program in Disaster Science, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
2 Department of Biology Education, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
3 Department of Psychology, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: andi_ulfa@usk.ac.id
Disaster preparedness is one of the efforts to reduce the impact of disasters. This preparedness is very important for people who directly feel the disaster and the impact of the disaster itself. Preparedness behavior in this community can be influenced by collective efficacy, namely the ability of community members to work together and take action in dealing with disasters. For this reason, it is necessary to develop an instrument that can measure collective efficacy in the context of disaster. This research focuses on developing instruments that can measure the collective efficacy of communities in the context of natural disasters based on local wisdom adapted to the local culture of Aceh. Collective efficacy instruments were developed, and content validity was tested. This article describes the procedure for calculating content validity coefficients. The purpose of this study was to conduct content validity of collective efficacy questionnaire for natural disasters based on Aceh local wisdom. Content validity refers to the extent to which the instrument covers the content that is supposed to be measured. Content validity was assessed using a five-point Likert scale and then analyzed using Aiken‟s V formula to obtain the content validity coefficient. Item analysis was carried out by 7 experts in the fields of psychometrics, social science, disaster science, and measurement who assessed content representation based on construction, relevance, and clarity. As a result, of the 47 items that were validated, 7 items did not meet the valid requirements because the content validity coefficient was below 0.75.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.