EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 447 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 447 (2023) 04004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 447, 2023
The 15th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 15th AIWEST-DR 2023)
Article Number 04004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Disaster Society, Culture and History
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344704004
Published online 13 November 2023
  1. LIPI-UNESCO/ISDR, “Kajian kesiapsiagaan masyarakat dalam mengantisipasi bencana gempa bumi dan tsunami (Assessment of Community Preparedness in Anticipating Earthquake and Tsunami Disasters),” Kaji. Kesiapsiagaan Masy. Dalam Mengantisipasi Bencana Gempa, pp. 1–579, 2006, [Online]. Available: http://www.buku-e.lipi.go.id/utama.cgi?lihatarsip&jans001&1273262299&51 [Google Scholar]
  2. G. A. Tobin, “Sustainability and community resilience: The holy grail of hazards planning?,” Environmental Hazards, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 13–25, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S1464-2867(99)00002-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. S. J. Zaccaro, V. Blair, C. Peterson, and M. Zazanis, “Collective Efficacy.” pp. 305–328, 1995. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_11. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Fay-Ramirez, E. Antrobus, and A. R. Piquero, “Assessing the effect of the Queensland „Summer of Disasters’ on perceptions of collective efficacy,” Social Science Research, vol. 54. pp. 21–35, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.06.017. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. H. Norris, S. P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K. F. Wyche, and R. L. Pfefferbaum, “Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness,” Am. J. Community Psychol., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 127–150, 2008, DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. M. Mathbor, “Enhancement of community preparedness for natural disasters,” International Social Work, vol. 50, no. 3. pp. 357–369, 2007. DOI: 10.1177/0020872807076049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Jugert, K. H. Greenaway, M. Barth, R. Büchner, S. Eisentraut, and I. Fritsche, “Collective efficacy increases proenvironmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 48, pp. 12–23, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Babcicky and S. Seebauer, “Collective efficacy and natural hazards: differing roles of social cohesion and task-specific efficacy in shaping risk and coping beliefs,” J. Risk Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 695–712, 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Arif, Catatan Pemikiran dari Titik Nol Tsunami Aceh: Membangun Negeri Sadar Bencana. Syiah Kuala University Press, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Fitri, “Nilai Budaya Lokal, Resiliensi, dan Kesiapan Menghadapi Bencana Alam,” Pers. J. Ilmu Psikol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. BNPB, “Dokumen kajian risiko bencana nasional provinsi Banten 2022 - 2026,” Kedeputian Bid. Sist. dan Strateg. Direktorat Pemetaan dan Eval. Risiko bencana, p. 173, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Messick, “Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment,” Educ. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 5–11, Mar. 1989, DOI: 10.3102/0013189X018002005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. AERA, APA, and NCME, “Standards for educational and psychological testing.” American Educational Research Association, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.” pp. 189–190, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Azwar, “Metode penelitian, edisi I,” Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Haynes, D. Richard, and E. Kubiancy, “Content validity in psychosocial assessmen: A functional approach to concept and method,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 7, no. 3. pp. 238–247, 1995. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Azwar, “Reliabilitas dan validitas,” 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. K. Hammitt and Y. Zhang, “Combining experts’ judgments: Comparison of algorithmic methods using synthetic data,” Risk Anal. An Int. J., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 109–120, 2013. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. H. Lawshe, “A quantitative approach to content validity,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 563–575, 1975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. G. Sireci and M. Faulkner-Bond, “Validity evidence based on test content,” Psicothema, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  21. L. R. Aiken, “Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 1985. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.