| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671601004 | |
| Published online | 09 June 2026 | |
Comparison of Particle Deposition under Air Curtain, Mixing Ventilation, and Displacement Ventilation in a Negative-Pressure Two-Bed Ward
1 Department of Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Technology, Yenisehir Ibrahim Orhan Vocational School, Bursa Uludag University, 16900, Bursa, Türkiye
2 Hermann-Rietschel-Institut, Technische Universität Berlin, Marchstraße 4, 10587 Berlin, Germany
* Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Abstract
Air curtain ventilation (ACV) has been proposed in the literature as a primary ventilation strategy for infection control in multi-bed hospital wards; however, its effect on particle accumulation compared to conventional mixed ventilation (MV) and displacement ventilation (DV) has not yet been sufficiently studied. This study uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to compare the accumulation rates of respiratory exhaled particles in a negative-pressure two-bed ward ventilated with ACV, MV, or DV. Both patients were modeled as sources emitting particles with diameters of 1 μm. Thus, the aim was to calculate the contamination from one patient to the other, and removal efficiency, cross-contamination, and self-contamination values were obtained. The results revealed that particle accumulation rates varied considerably depending on the type of ventilation. In the MV scenario, the accumulated particles were more homogeneously distributed throughout the ward, increasing the risk of cross-contamination between beds. In the DV case, the lowest airflow efficiency was observed due to the inadequacy of thermal buoyancy in preventing particle deposition, leading to significant self-contamination among patients. In contrast, the ACV provided a more directed airflow that limited accumulation to an area closer to the source patient and reduced particle transfer to the adjacent bed. These findings demonstrate that air curtain ventilation can alter both the magnitude and location of particle accumulation, thus offering a promising alternative for reducing infection in negative pressure patient wards by limiting cross-contamination.
Key words: Air curtain / Patient ward / Cross contamination / Deposition / CFD
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

