| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01011 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Indoor Air Quality and Ventilation | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671601011 | |
| Published online | 09 June 2026 | |
Measured influence of supply airflow rate and supply air temperature on air mixing time in a room with overhead mixed system
1 Indoor Environment Group, Sustainable Energy and Environmental Systems Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
2 Center for the Built Environment, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
3 Department of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Abstract
Air mixing and movement are often driven by the design and operating conditions of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, and are influenced by occupants and thermal gradients at windows and walls. Air mixing affects the indoor-generated pollutants dispersion and thus influences the effectiveness of ventilation and within-room air cleaning systems, including upper-room germicidal ultraviolet disinfection (GUV). In rooms with a ceiling exhaust and/or upper-room GUV, upward airflow from occupants can enable faster pollutant removal compared to well-mixed conditions. We used pulsed ethanol as a tracer and measured concentration at 2 s time resolution using fast-response metal oxide sensors at three levels: near the floor at 0.1-0.4 m, mid-height at 1.1-1.4 m, and at 2.4 m, 0.3 m from the 2.74 m ceiling. Forty experiments were conducted under the following conditions: HVAC off; supply air at ~380 (low) or ~1200 m3 h−1 (high) at neutral, cooling, or heating temperatures with 20% or 100% outdoor air; and added mixing fans. Air mixing times were determined from the start of ethanol release until the relative standard deviation of the concentrations fell below 20%, indicating an approximately well-mixed condition. We found that the air mixing time was longest with the HVAC off (15.1-15.4 min), followed by conditions with a low total supply airflow rate at all temperatures (6.6-11.4 min under heating; 5.6-10.1 min under neutral/cooling), and was fastest under high airflow at neutral/cooling temperatures (2.9-5.6 min) or when mixing fans were added (1.9-1.8 min). The outdoor airflow rate (20% or 100%) did not significantly affect spatial heterogeneity or air mixing time. Long air mixing times resulted in high spatial variability of absolute integrated concentrations and relative exposures. Under slow mixing conditions (HVAC off or low airflow rate) and with releases associated with heaters simulating occupants, several upper or mid-level sensors peaked after the release, and mixing into the upper room and occupied space was slow. Under fast mixing conditions (high airflow rate with neutral/cooling settings or added fan), air reached and mixed in the upper room more quickly and spread faster in the occupied zone.
Key words: Ventilation effectiveness / Air distribution / Airborne transmission / Infectious aerosol / Germicidal ultraviolet irradiation
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

