Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 03014
Number of page(s) 6
Section Performance and behaviour of flood defences
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. BBC News (2004). Flooding cost ‘may rise 20-fold. <>. [Google Scholar]
  2. GouldbyB., SayersP., Mulet-MartiJ., HassanM.A.A.M. and BenwellD. (2008). A methodology for regional-scale flood risk assessment. Proceedings of the ICE – Water Management, 161(3), 169–182. [Google Scholar]
  3. BuijsF., GouldbyB. and SayersP. (2006). Preliminary reliability analysis on the Thames Estuary: Dartford Creek to Gravesend, Report No. T07-06-07, Floodsite. [Google Scholar]
  4. BuijsF.A., HallJ.W., SayersP.B. and Van GelderP.H. (2009). Time-dependent reliability analysis of flood defences. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(12), 1942–1953. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. ChenH.P. and AlaniA.M. (2012). Reliability and optimised maintenance for sea defences. Proceedings of the ICE - Maritime Engineering, 165(2), 51–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. NepalJ., ChenH.P., GouldbyB., SimmJ. and TarrantO. (2015). State-based stochastic performance deterioration modelling of flood defence assets. 7th International Society for Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, Torino, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  7. LongG., MawdesleyM. and SimmJ. (2008). Improved Approaches to Condition Assessment—Volume 2: Detailed Technical Report, FRMRC Research Report UR10. Flood Risk Management Research Consortium (FRMRC). [Google Scholar]
  8. HR Wallingford (2004). Performance and Reliability of Flood and Coastal Defences, DEFRA/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programme. [Google Scholar]
  9. LongG., MawdesleyM. and SimmJ. (2006). Improved Approaches to Condition Assessment—Volume 1: Performance-Based Visual Inspection of Flood Defence Assets, FRMRC Research Report UR10. Flood Risk Management Research Consortium (FRMRC). [Google Scholar]
  10. ChenH.P. and AlanA.M. (2013). Optimized maintenance strategy for concrete structures affected by cracking due to reinforcement corrosion, ACIStructural Journal, 110(2), 229–238. [Google Scholar]
  11. SaydamD., FrangopolD. and DongY. (2013). Assessment of risk using bridge element condition ratings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE, 19(3), 252–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Environment Agency (2006). Managing Flood Risk - Condition Assessment Manual. Reference 166_03_SD01, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK. [Google Scholar]
  13. Environment Agency (2013). Delivering Benefits through Evidence - Practical guidance on determining asset deterioration and the use of condition grade deterioration curves: Revision 1. Reference SC060078/R1, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK. [Google Scholar]
  14. NepalJ. and ChenH.P. Markov chain based stochastic deterioration modelling of repaired flood defence structures using evolutionary algorithm. 13th International Probabilistic Workshop (IPW2015), Liverpool, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. HR Wallingford 5 (2011). Humber Estuary Study – Final report. Wallingford, HR Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  16. RanjithS., SetungeS., GravinaR. and VenkatesanS. (2013). Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 27(3), 319–325. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.