Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 04014
Number of page(s) 5
Section Hazard analysis and modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160704014
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Savina M., Hilberts A., Peiris N., Nicotina L., Rentzos P., Assteerawatt A., Zanardo S., Zovi F. (2016). RMS pan-Europe HD Flood models. Floodrisk conference 2016.
  2. Assteerawatt A., Tsaknias D., Azemar F., Gosh S., Hilberts A. (2016). Large-scale and High-resolution Flood Risk Model for Japan. Floodrisk conference 2016.
  3. Ehrendorfer, M. 1987. A regionalization of Austria’s precipitation climate using principal component analysis, J. Climatol. 7, 71–89. [CrossRef]
  4. Grieser J. and Jewson S. (2011). The RMS TC Rain Model. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 21(1), 79–88. [CrossRef]
  5. Beven K. and Kirkby M. (1979). A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydroligical Sciences Bulletin 24 (1), 43–69. [CrossRef]
  6. Pellicciotti F., Brock B., Strasser U., Burlando P., Funk M., Corripio J. (2005). An enhanced temperature-index glacier melt model including the shortwave radiation balance: development and testing for Haut Glacier d’Arolla, Switzerland. Journal of Glaciology 51(175), 573–587. [CrossRef]
  7. Cunge J.A. (1969). On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Muskingum method), Journal of. Hydraulic Research, 7(2), 205–230. [CrossRef]
  8. Georgakakos K.P. (1990). A State-Space Model for Hydrologic River Routing. Water Resources Research 26(5), 827–838.
  9. Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., Meyarivan T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation, 6(2), 182–197. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.