EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 18006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 18006
Number of page(s) 10
Section Forecasting and warning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160718006
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. EU (2007). Directive 2007/60/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks, Official Journal of the European Union, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cabinet Office (2008). The Pitt Review: lessons learned from the 2007 floods. London, Cabinet Office. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cole S. J., Moore R. J., Aldridge T., Lane A. and Laeger S. (2013). Real-time hazard impact modeling of surface water flooding: some UK developments. International Conference on Flood Resilience: Experiences in Asia and Europe, Exeter, UK, 5-7 Sept. 2013, 67–68. [Google Scholar]
  4. Golding B. W., Ballard S. P., Mylne K., Roberts N., Saulter A., Wilson C., Agnew P., Davis L. S., Trice J., Jones C., Simonin D., Li Z., Pierce C., Bennett A., Weeks M. and Moseley S. (2014). Forecasting capabilities for the London 2012 Olympics. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 95, 883–896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ochoa-Rodriguez S., Thraves L. and Johnson A. (2013) Surface water flood warnings in England: An overview, assessment and recommendations based on survey responses and workshops, In: Butler D., Chen A.S., Djordjević S. and Hammond M. (eds.), Proc. Int. Conf. on Flood Resilience: Experiences in Asia and Europe (ICFR 2013), University of Exeter. [Google Scholar]
  6. Parker D. J., Priest S. J. and McCarthy S. S. (2011) Surface water flood warnings requirements and potential in England and Wales, Applied Geography, 31(3), 891–900. [Google Scholar]
  7. Moore R. J., Cole S. J., Bell V. A. and Jones D. A. (2006). Issues in flood forecasting: ungauged basins, extreme floods and uncertainty. In: Tchiguirinskaia I., Thein K. N. N. & Hubert P. (eds.), Frontiers in Flood Research, 8th Kovacs Colloquium, UNESCO, Paris, June/July 2006, IAHS Publ. 305, 103–122. [Google Scholar]
  8. Price D., Hudson K., Boyce G., Schellekens J., Moore R. J., Clark P., Harrison T., Connolly E. and Pilling C. (2012). Operational use of a grid-based model for flood forecasting. Proc. ICE – Water Manage., 165, 65–77. [Google Scholar]
  9. EA (2014) Framework and tools for local flood risk assessment. Science Report SC070059/R3, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK. [Google Scholar]
  10. Vinet F., Lumbroso D., Defossez S. and Boissier L. (2012). A comparative analysis of the loss of life during two recent floods in France: the sea surge caused by the storm Xynthia and the flash flood in Var. Natural Hazards, 61, 1179–1201. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wallingford HR, Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre and Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd (2005). Flood Risks to People Phase 2: The Risks to People Methodology, Defra / Environment Agency Report: FD2321/TR1. [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyer V., Becker N., Markantonis V., Schwarze R., van den Bergh J. C. J. M., Bouwer L. M., Bubeck P., Ciavola P., Genovese E., Green C., Hallegatte S., Kreibich H., Lequeux Q., Logar I., Papyrakis E., Pfurtscheller C., Poussin J., Przyluski V., Thieken A.H. and Viavattene C. (2013). Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards - state of the art and knowledge gaps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(5), 1351–1373. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Penning-Rowsell E., Johnson C., Tunstall S., Tapsell S., Morris J., Chatterton J. and Green C. with contributions from Wilson T., Koussela K. and Fernandez-Bilbao A. (2013). The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment Techniques, Middlesex University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kazmierczak A. and Kenny C. (2011). Risk of flooding to infrastructure in Greater Manchester. EcoCities project University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pikusa E. (2015). The National Emergency Risk Assessment Guidelines: The Bumpy Road to National Consistency. Floodplain Management Association National Conference, 19-22 May 2015, Brisbane, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  16. EA (2012) Flooding 2012 summary events – England and Wales. Environment Agency. [Google Scholar]
  17. Newcastle City Council (2013) Summer 2012 Flooding in Newcastle upon Tyne: A report on the experiences of residences and non-residential property managers http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/sites/drupalncc.newcastle.gov.uk/files/wwwfileroot/environment/environment/microsoft_word_-_summer_2012_flooding_report_-_final_-_july_2013.pdf. Last accessed 03/07/2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. EA (2014). The updated Flood Map for Surface Water (uFMfSW) Property Points dataset: July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith G. and Fairburn J. (2008). Updating and improving the National Population Database to National Population database 2. HSE Research Report RR 678. [Google Scholar]
  20. EA (2010). National Receptor Dataset: guidance for Environment Agency Staff and professional Partners. Environment Agency. [Google Scholar]
  21. Meyer V., Haase D and Scheuer S. (2007). GIS-based Multicriteria Analysis as Decision Support in Flood Risk Management, FLOODsite Report T10-07-07. [Google Scholar]
  22. Met Office (2014). The Met Office ensemble system. (MOGREPS) http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/areas/dataassimilation-and-ensembles/ensembleforecasting/MOGREPS. Last Accessed 29/05/2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tapsell S. M., Penning-Rowsell E. C. Tunstall S. M. and Wilson T. L. (2002). Vulnerability to flooding: health and social dimensions. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society A 360, 1511–1525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.