Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 18018
Number of page(s) 9
Section Forecasting and warning
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. EU (2007): Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of flood risks (2007/60/EG); Brussels: Commission of the European Union;; [Accessed: 06.03.2015]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Weerts, H. A., Schellekens, J. and Weiland, F. S. (2010): Real-Time Geospatial Data Handling and Forecasting: Examples from Delft-FEWS Forecasting Platform/System. In: Journal of selected topics in applied earth observation and remote sensing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 386–394. - ISSN 1939-1404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Verkade, J. S. and Werner, M. (2011): Estimating the benefits of single value and probability forecasting for flood warning. In: Hydrology and Earth System Science, Vol. 15, pp. 3751–3765. - ISSN 1027-5606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. UNISDR (2005): Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015 – Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters; UNISDR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction);; [Accessed: 17.05.2016]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kron, A. and Nestmann, F. (2009): Operationelles Hochwassermanagement in großräumigen Extremsituationen am Beispiel der Mittleren Elbe. Final report for BMBF- research project.; [Accessed: 06.03.2015]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Krzhizhanovskaya, V. V., Shirshov, G. S.,Melnikova, N. B., Belleman, R. G., Rusadi, F. I., Broekhuijsen, B.J., Gouldby, B.P., Lhomme, J., Balis, B., Bubak, M., Pyayt, A. L., Mokhov, I. I., Ozhigin, A. V., Lang, B. and Meijer, R. J. (2011): Flood early warning system: design, implemen-tation and computational modules. In: Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 4, pp. 106–115. - ISSN 1877-0509. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dale, M., Wicks, J., Mylne, K., Pappenberger, F., Laeger, S. and Taylor, S. (2014): Probabilistic flood forecasting and decision-making: an innovative risk based approach. In: Natural Hazards, Vol. 70, pp. 159–172. - ISSN 0921-030X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Werner, M., Schellekens, J., Gijbers, P., van Dijk, M., van den Akker, O. and Heynert, K. (2013): The Delft-FEWS flow forecasting system. In: Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 40, pp. 65–77. - ISSN 1364-8152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, J., Dawson, R., Sayers, P., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J. U. and Deakin, R. (2003): A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. In: Water & Maritime Engineering, Vol. 156, No. WM3, pp. 235–247. - ISSN 1472-4561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Casciati, F. and Faravelli, L. (1991): Fragility Analysis of Complex Structural Systems, West Sussex (GB): John Wiley & Sons Inc. - ISBN 0-86380-114-5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schultz, M., Gouldby, B., Simm, J. and Wibowo, J. (2010): Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability. ERDC SR 10 1. G. a. S. Laboratory, USACE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simm, J. Gouldby, B., Sayers, P., Flikweert, J.-J., Wersching, S. and Bramley, M. (2009): Representing fragility of flood and coastal defences: Getting into the detail. In: Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice / Samuels et al. London (GB): Taylor & Francis Group, - ISBN 978-0-415-48507-4. [Google Scholar]
  13. van der Meer, J. W., ter Horst, W. L. A. and van Velzen, E. H. (2009): Calculation of fragility curves for flood defence assets. In: Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice / Samuels et al. London (GB): Taylor & Francis Group, - ISBN 978-0-415-48507-4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Vorogushyn, S., Merz, B., Lindenschmidt, K.-E. and, Apel, H. (2010): A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches. In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 46. - ISSN 0043-1397. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bachmann, D. and Schüttrumpf, H. (2014): Integration der Zuverlässigkeit von Hochwasserschutzbauwerken in die einzugsgebietsbasierte Hochwasserrisikoanalyse. In: Hydrology and water resources management - Germany, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 168–177. - ISSN 1439-1783. [Google Scholar]
  16. Diermanse, F. L. M., De Bruijn, K. M., Beckers, J. V. L. and Kramer, N. L. (2015): Importance sampling for efficient modelling of hydraulic loads in the Rhine–Meuse delta. In: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 29, Issue 3, pp. 637–652. – ISSN 1436-3240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bachmann, D., Johann, G., Huber, N.P and Schüttrumpf, H. (2013): Fragility curves in operational dike reliability assessment. – In: Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 7:1, pp. 49–60.- ISSN 1749-9518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. van der Meij, R. (2013): Overhoogte in Rijnmond-Drechtsteden. Report Deltares 1207828–003. [Google Scholar]
  19. Stelling, G. S. (2012): Quadtree flood simulations with subgrid digital elevation models. In: Water Management, Vol. 165, Issue WM10, pp. 567–580. -ISSN 1751-7729. [Google Scholar]
  20. Verheij, H. (2003): Aanpassen van het bresgroeimodel binnen HIS-OM. Report. DelftHydraulics, Delft (NL). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.