Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 18019
Number of page(s) 8
Section Forecasting and warning
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. CRED (2016). Data from EM-DAT, the OFDA (US Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance)/CRED International Disaster Database,, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  2. United Nations (2015). Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
  3. D.I. Smith, J.W. Handmer and D. Taylor (1992). How effective would improved flood warning systems be in reducing rural flood losses? Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of Flood Mitigation Authorities of NSW, Bankstown, 12–15 May, CRES, ANU.
  4. L. Alfieri, P. Burek, E. Dutra, B. Krzeminski, D. Muraro, J. Thielen and F. Pappenberger (2013) GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, pp. 1161–1175, doi:10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013. [CrossRef]
  5. R. E. Emerton, E. M. Stephens, F. Pappenberger, T. C. Pagano, A. H. Weerts, A. W. Wood and C. A. Baugh (2016). Continental and global scale flood forecasting systems. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water.
  6. J. Thielen, J. Bartholmes, M.-H. Ramos and A. de Roo (2009). The European flood alert System – Part 1: Concept and development. In: Hydrology and Earth System Science, Vol. 13, pp. 125–140. ISSN 1027-5606. [CrossRef]
  7. M. Werner, M. Cranston, T. Harrison, D. Whitfield and J. Schellekens (2009). Review: Recent developments in operational flood forecasting in England, Wales and Scotland. In: Meteorological Applications, Vol. 16, pp. 13–22. ISSN 1469-8080. [CrossRef]
  8. E. Brown and W. Tschirhardt (2012) Development of Operational Flood Forecasting Systems in the San Antonio River Basin. Paper presented at Associated Flood Plain Managers’ Conference (ASFPM), May 20–25, San Antonio, USA.
  9. K. Sene (2008). Flood Warning, Forecasting and emergency response. Springer Science + Business Media B.V. ISBN 978-3-540-77852–. [CrossRef]
  10. M. Werner, P. Reggiani, A. de Roo, P. Bates and E. Sprokkereef (2005). Flood forecasting and warning at the river basin and at the European scale. In: Natural Hazards, Vol. 36, pp. 25–42. ISSN 0921-030X. [CrossRef]
  11. E. J. Langkamp, L. R. Wentholt, B. E. Pengel, C. de Gooijer and J. J. Flikweert (2005). NOAH, the right information at the right time at the right place. In: Floods, from Defence to Management – van Alphen, van Beek & Taal (eds), Taylor & Francis Group, London. ISBN 0 415380502.
  12. Lizard (2014). The LIZARD platform.; [Accessed 03.03.2015].
  13. A. Kron and F. Nestmann (2009). Operationelles Hochwassermanagement in großräumi-gen Extremsituationen am Beispiel der Mittleren Elbe. Final report for BMBF- research project.; [Accessed: 06.03.2015].
  14. Simm J., Jordan D., Topple A., Mokhov I., Pyay. A., Abdoun T., Bennett V., Broekhuijsen J. and Meijer. R. (2013). Interpreting sensor measurements in dikes – experiences from UrbanFlood pilot sites. In Comprehensive Flood Risk Management: Research for Policy and Practice, Klijn & Schweckendiek (eds), Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. 327–336.
  15. V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, G. S. Shirshov, N. B. Melnikova, R. G. Belleman, F. I. Rusadi, B.J. Broekhuijsen, B.P. Gouldby, J. Lhomme, B. Balis, M. Bubak, A. L. Pyayt, I. I. Mokhov, A. V. Ozhigin, B. Lang and R. J. Meijer (2011). Flood early warning system: design, implementation and computational modules. In: Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 4, pp. 106–115. ISSN 1877-0509. [CrossRef]
  16. L. Speight, M. Cranston, R.J. Moore, S.J. Cole, B. Golding, C. Pierce, B. Wright, N. Roberts, S. Ghimire and S. Dunn (2014). Development of a pilot surface water alerting tool for Glasgow and operational use during the Commonwealth Games. 12th British Hydrological Society National Symposium, Birmingham, UK.
  17. P. Nguyen, A. Thorstensen, S. Sorooshian, K. Hsu, and A. AghaKouchak (2015). Flood Forecasting and Inundation Mapping Using HiResFlood-UCI and Near-Real-Time Satellite Precipitation Data: The 2008 Iowa Flood. American Meteorological Society Special IFloodS collection p. 1171, June 2015.
  18. H. A. Weerts, J. Schellekens and F. S. Weiland (2010). Real-Time Geospatial Data Handling and Forecasting: Examples from Delft-FEWS Forecasting Platform/System. In: Journal of selected topics in applied earth observation and remote sensing, 3(3), pp. 386–394. - ISSN 1939-1404. [CrossRef]
  19. M. Werner, J. Schellekens, P. Gijbers, M. van Dijk, O. van den Akker, and K. Heynert (2013). The Delft-FEWS flow forecasting system. In: Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 40, pp. 65–77. ISSN 1364-8152. [CrossRef]
  20. D. Bachmann, D. Eilander, A. de Leeuw, K. de Bruijn, F. Diermanse, A. Weerts and J. Beckers (in press) Prototypes of risk-based flood forecasting systems in the Netherlands and Italy. Paper to be presented at FLOODrisk 2016, Lyon, France.
  21. J. Hall, R. Dawson, P. Sayers, C. Rosu, J. U. Chatterton, and R. Deakin (2003). A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. In: Water & Maritime Engineering, Vol. 156, No. WM3, pp. 235–247. ISSN 1472-4561. [CrossRef]
  22. F. Casciati and L. Faravelli (1991). Fragility Analysis of Complex Structural Systems, West Sussex (GB): John Wiley & Sons Inc. ISBN 0-86380-114–5.
  23. M. Schultz, B. Gouldby, J. Simm, and J. Wibowo (2010). Beyond the Factor of Safety: Developing Fragility Curves to Characterize System Reliability. ERDC SR 10 1. G. a. S. Laboratory, USACE. [CrossRef]
  24. J. Simm B. Gouldby, P. Sayers, J.-J. Flikweert S. Wersching and M. Bramley (2009). Representing fragility of flood and coastal defences: Getting into the detail. In: Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice. Samuels et al. London (GB): Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-48507-4.
  25. J. W. van der Meer, W. L. A. ter Horst and van VelzenE. H. (2009). Calculation of fragility curves for flood defence assets. In: Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice. Samuels et al. London (GB): Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-48507-4.
  26. S. Vorogushyn, B. Merz, K.-E. Lindenschmidt and H. Apel (2010). A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches. In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 46. ISSN 0043-1397. [CrossRef]
  27. D. Bachmann and H. Schüttrumpf (2014). Integration der Zuverlässigkeit von Hochwas-serschutzbauwerken in die einzugsgebietsbasierte Hochwasserrisikoanalyse. In: Hydrology and water resources management - Germany, Vol. 58(3), pp. 168–177. ISSN 1439-1783.
  28. Floodsite (2008). Reliability Analysis of Flood Sea Defence Structures and Systems (Main Text); Report Number T07-08-01;; [Accessed 03.12.2012].
  29. D. Bachmann, G. Johann, N.P. Huber and H. Schüttrumpf (2013). Fragility curves in operational dike reliability assessment. – In: Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 7(1), pp. 49–60. ISSN 1749-9518. [CrossRef]
  30. B.P. Gouldby, P. Sayers, J. Mulet-Marti, M. Hassan and D. Benwell (2008). A Methodology for Regional Scale Flood Risk Assessment, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng Wat. Man., Vol. 161, Issue WM3.
  31. S. Jamieson, J. Lhomme, G. Wright and B.P. Gouldby (2012). Highly efficient 2D inundation modelling with enhanced diffusion-wave and sub-element topography. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Wat. Man. 165 (10): 581–595. [CrossRef]
  32. S.R. Jamieson, G. Wright, J. Lhomme and B.P. Gouldby (2013). Validation of a computationally efficient 2D inundation model on multiple scales. Comprehensive Flood Risk Management.
  33. Environment Agency (2010). Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages. Bristol: Environment Agency.
  34. Defra (2003) Flood Risks to People: Phase 1. R&D Technical Report FD2317. Defra/Environment Agency Flood and Coastal Defence R&D Programme, UK.
  35. J. Dewelde, S. Verbeke, E. Quintelier, P. Cabus, A. Vermeulen, T. Vansteenkiste, I. de Jongh and K. Cauwenberghs (2014) Real-time flood forecasting systems in Flanders. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, 8th January 2014, City College of New York, USA. CUNY Academic Works.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.