Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 18020
Number of page(s) 8
Section Forecasting and warning
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Met Office (2016). The Met Office ensemble system (MOGREPS). (last accessed 22 February 2016). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Seed (2003). A dynamic and spatial scaling approach to advection forecasting. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 42, 381–388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bowler, N. E. H., Pierce, C. E. and A. W. Seed (2006). STEPS: A probabilistic precipitation forecasting scheme which merges an extrapolation nowcast with downscaled NWP. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 132, 2127–2155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Seed, A. W., Pierce, C. E. and K. Norman (2013). Formulation and evaluation of a scale decomposition-based stochastic precipitation nowcast scheme. Water Resources Research, 49, 6624–6641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole, S. J. and R. J. Moore (2008). Hydrological modelling using raingauge- and radar-based estimators of areal rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 358(3–4), 159–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moore, R. J., Jones, A. E., Jones, D. A., Black, K. B. and V. A. Bell (2004). Weather radar for flood forecasting: some UK experiences. 6th International Symposium on Hydrological Applications of Weather Radar, 2-4 February 2004, Melbourne, Australia, 11pp. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tang, Y., Lean, H.W. and J. Bornemann (2013). The benefits of the Met Office variable resolution NWP model for forecasting convection. Meteorological Applications, 20, 417–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moore, R. J., Cole, S. J., Bell, V. A. and D. A. Jones (2006). Issues in flood forecasting: ungauged basins, extreme floods and uncertainty. In: Tchiguirinskaia, I., Thein, K. N. N. & Hubert, P. (eds.), Frontiers in Flood Research, 8th Kovacs Colloquium, UNESCO, Paris, June/July 2006, IAHS Publication 305, 103–122. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bell, V. A., Kay, A. L., Jones, R. G., Moore, R. J. and N. S. Reynard (2009). Use of soil data in a grid-based hydrological model to estimate spatial variation in changing flood risk across the UK. Journal of Hydrology, 377, 335–350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole, S.J. and R. J. Moore (2009). Distributed hydrological modelling using weather radar in gauged and ungauged basins. Advances in Water Resources, 32, 1107–1120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Price, D., Hudson, K., Boyce, G., Schellekens, J., Moore, R.J., Clark, P., Harrison, T., Connolly, E. and C. Pilling (2012). Operational use of a grid-based model for flood forecasting. Water Management, 165(2), 65–77. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cranston, M., Maxey, R., Tavendale, A., Buchanan, P., Motion, A., Cole, S., Robson, A., Moore, R.J. and A. Minett (2012). Countrywide flood forecasting in Scotland: challenges for hydrometeorological model uncertainty and prediction. In: Weather Radar and Hydrology (ed. by R. J. Moore, S. J. Cole & A. J. Illingworth) (Proceedings Exeter Symposium, April 2011), IAHS Publication 351, 538–542. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cole, S. J., Moore, R. J., Robson, A. J., Mattingley, P. S., Black, K. B. and A. L. Kay (2014). Evaluating G2G for use in Rapid Response Catchments: Final Report. R&D Project Report SC110003/R1, Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management, Research Contractor: CEH Wallingford, 115pp. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.