EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 21003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 21003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Adaptation to long term change
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160721003
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Botzen W.J.W., Van den Bergh J.C.J.M. and Bouwer L.M. (2010) Climate change and increased risk for the insurance sector: a global perspective and an assessment for the Netherlands. Natural Hazards 52: 577–598 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouwer L.M., Bubeck P. and Aerts J.C.J.H. (2010) Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area. Global Environmental Change 20: 463–471 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klijn F., Baan P., De Bruijn K.M., Kwadijk J. (2007) Flood risks in the Netherlands in a changing climate; expectations, estimates and calculations for the 2nd Sustainability Outlook for the Netherlands. Delft Hydraulics report Q4290, Delft (in Dutch) [Google Scholar]
  4. Klijn F., Kwadijk J., De Bruijn K.M. and Hunink J. (2010) Flood risks and drought risks in a changing climate; survey of pathways to climate-change proofing the Netherlands. Deltares report 1002565, Delft (in Dutch) [Google Scholar]
  5. Klijn F., De Bruijn K.M., Knoop J. and Kwadijk J.C.J. (2012) Assessment of the Netherlands’ flood risk management policy under global change. Ambio 41:180–192 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ten Brinke, W.B.M and Bannink B.A. (2004). Dutch dikes and risk hikes. A thematic policy evaluation of risks of flooding in the Netherlands. RIVM Report 500799002, Bilthoven (in Dutch) [Google Scholar]
  7. Delta Committee (2008) Working together with water. A vital country builds its future. The Hague (in Dutch) [Google Scholar]
  8. Delta Programme, 2011. Delta Programme 2012: Taking measures now, preparing for tomorrow (in Dutch). Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment and Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, The Hague. [Google Scholar]
  9. Holling C. (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, Chichester, UK. [Google Scholar]
  10. McLain R. and Lee R. (1996) Adaptive management: promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management 20/4: 437–448 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pahl-Wöstl C., Sendzimir J., Jeffrey P., Aerts J., Berkamp G. and Cross K. (2007) Managing change towards adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society 12/2: 30 (online) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Medema W., McIntosh B. and Jeffrey P. (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of Water Resources Management and Adaptive Management approaches in the water sector. Ecology and Society 13/2: 29 (online) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walker W.E. (2000) Policy analysis: a systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 9(1–3):11–27 [Google Scholar]
  14. Thissen, W.A.H and Walker W.E. (eds) (2013) Public Policy Analysis, New Developments. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Volume 179, Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kwakkel J.H. and Pruyt E. (2013) Exploratory Modeling and Analysis, an approach for modelbased foresight under deep uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80/3: 419–431 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Rhee G. (2012) Handreiking Adaptief Deltamanagement (in Dutch). Stratelligence, Leiden [Google Scholar]
  17. Van der Most H., Tánczos I., De Bruijn K.M., Wagenaar D. (2014) Development of new, risk-based standards for flood protection in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the ICFM6 conference, September 2014, Sao Paolo, Brasil [Google Scholar]
  18. Klijn, F., Samuels P. and Van Os A. (2008). Towards Flood Risk Management in the EU: state of affairs with examples from various European countries. Journal for River Basin Management 6(2008)/4: 307–321 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bubeck, P., Kreibich H., Penning-Rowsell E.C., Botzen W., De Moel H. and Klijn F. (2015). Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and the USA – A comparative analysis. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12151, Journal of Flood Risk Management. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kind J.M. (2014). Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. Journal of Flood Risk Management. [Google Scholar]
  21. De Bruijn K.M., Klijn F., Van de Pas B. and Slager C.T.J. (2015). Flood fatality hazard and flood damage hazard: combining multiple hazard characteristics into meaningful maps for spatial planning. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1297–1309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Anonymous (2014). Technisch-inhoudelijke uitwerking DPV 2.2: consequentieanalyse voor primaire keringen (september 2014). (in Dutch). [Google Scholar]
  23. Deltares (2014). KOSten voor versterking WATerkeringen. KOSWAT, systeemdocumentatie. Deltares, Delft. (in Dutch). [Google Scholar]
  24. Slomp R., Knoeff H. and Bottema M. (2016). Probabilistic Flood Defence Assessment Tools. Proceedings of the FLOODrisk2016 conference Lyon/ this volume. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sperna Weiland F., Hegnauer M., Bouaziz L. and Beersma J. (2015). Implications of the KNMI’14 climate scenarios for the discharge of the Rhine and Meuse; comparison with earlier scenario studies. Deltares report 1220042-000, Delft [Google Scholar]
  26. Klijn, F., Hegnauer M., Beersma J. and Sperna Weiland F. (2015). Wat betekenen de nieuwe klimaatscenario’s voor de rivierafvoeren van Rijn en Maas? Samenvatting van onderzoek met GRADE naar implicaties van nieuwe klimaatprojecties voor rivierafvoeren. (in Dutch) Deltares & KNMI, Delft. [Google Scholar]
  27. Klijn, F., De Bruin D., De Hoog M., Jansen S. and Sijmons D. (2013). Design quality of Room-for-the-River measures in the Netherlands: role and assessment of the Quality Team (Q-team). Journal of River Basin Management 11(2013)/3: 287–299 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Anonymous (2015). Report Working Group Discount Rate 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Haigh N. and Fisher J. (2010). Using a “Real Options” approach to determine a future strategic plan for flood risk management in the Thames Estuary. Draft Government Economic Service Working Paper. [Google Scholar]
  30. Woodward M, Kapelan Z, Gouldby B (2014) Adaptive flood risk management under climate change uncertainty using real options and optimisation. Risk Analysis 34/1:75–92 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Haasnoot M (2013) Anticipating Change. Sustainable Water Policy Pathways for an Uncertain Future. PhD thesis, UT Twente. ISBN 978-90-365-3559–5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lempert R.J. and Collins M.T. (2007). Managing the Risk of Uncertain Threshold Responses: Comparison of Robust, Optimum, and Precautionary Approaches. Risk Analysis 27(2007): 1009–1026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Klijn, F., Mens M.J.P. and Asselman N.E.M. (2015). Flood risk management for an uncertain future: economic efficiency and system robustness perspectives compared for the Meuse River (Netherlands). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Global Change (MITI), 20(2015)/6:1011–1026 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.