Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 24001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Ethics, equity and social responsibility
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Sen A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnson C., Penning-Rowsell E.C., and Parker D.J. (2007). Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood risk management policy in England, The Geographical Journal, 173, 374–390. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rawls J. (2001). Justice as fairness: a restatement. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mill J.S. (1863) Utilitarianism. London :Dent. [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson C., Tunstall S., Priest S., McCarthy S. and Penning-Rowsell E. (2008) Social Justice in the Context of Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management: A Review of Policy and Practice. Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D Programme. London: Flood Hazard Research Centre. [Google Scholar]
  6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2011). Flood and coastal resilience partnership funding: Defra policy statement on an outcome-focused, partnership approach to funding flood and coastal erosion risk management. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  7. Johns D. (2011). ‘Understanding the risks, building resilience, empowering communities: A benefit-led, partnership approach to funding’, PowerPoint presentation. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) (1999). Flood and Coastal Defence Project Appraisal Guidance (FCDPAG3) Economic Appraisal. London: MAFF London [Google Scholar]
  9. Bennett O. and Hartwell-Naguib. S. (2014). Flood defence spending in England. London: House of Commons Library. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shelter. (2014). Who gets priority for council housing. Retrieved 23/11/14, from [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindley S., O’Neill J., Kandeh J., Lawson N., Christian R., and O’Neill M. (2011). Climate change, justice and vulnerability. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pringle P., Paavola J., Dale N., Sibille R., Kent N., & Le Cornu E. (2013). PREPARE - Understanding the equity and distributional impacts of climate risks and adaptation options, Part of the PREPARE Programme of research on preparedness, adaptation and risk, Final Report for project ERG1211: Ricardo-AEA for Defra. [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitehead C., and Scanlon K. (2007). Social Housing in Europe. London: London School of Economics [Google Scholar]
  14. Porter J., Dessai S. and Tompkins E. (2014). What do we know about UK household adaptation to climate change? A systematic review. Climatic Change, 127, 371–379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Homes S. (2013). Your social housing in a changing climate. London: London Climate Change Partnership. [Google Scholar]
  16. The Poverty Site. (2014). The Poverty Site: Key Facts. Retrieved 12/01/15, from [Google Scholar]
  17. Fielding J., & Burningham K. (2005). Environmental Inequality and Flood Hazard, Local Environment 10(4), 1–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kates R. W., Travis W. R. and Wilbanks T. J. (2012). Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(19), 7156–7161. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lamond J. and Penning-Rowsell E.C. (2014). The robustness of flood insurance regimes given changing risk resulting from climate change. Climate Risk Management, 2, 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. UK Government (2014) Water Act 2014, Chapter 21, London :The Stationery Office [Google Scholar]
  21. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2014). The Flood Reinsurance Scheme–Regulations. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  22. Flood Re (2016). The first Flood Re transition plan: Transitioning to an affordable market for household flood insurance. Flood Re: London. Retrieved 20/02/16, from [Google Scholar]
  23. Penning-Rowsell E.C and Priest S.J. (2015). Sharing the burden: who pays for flood insurance and flood risk management in the UK, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Global Change, 20(6), 991–1009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Penning-Rowsell E. C. and Pardoe J. (2015). The distributional consequences of future flood risk management in England and Wales Environment and Planning C, 33, 1301–1321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2013). Securing the future availability and affordability of home insurance in areas of flood risk. A consultation seeking views on the Government’s proposals for securing the availability and affordability of flood insurance in areas of flood risk. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  26. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2014). The Flood Reinsurance Scheme–Regulations. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  27. Flood Re website (2016). Funding, Retrieved 20/02/16, from [Google Scholar]
  28. Penning‐Rowsell E.C. and Pardoe J. (2012). Who loses if flood risk is reduced: Should we be concerned? Area, 44(2). 152–159 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Penning-Rowsell E.C. and Pardoe J. (2012). Who benefits and who loses from flood risk reduction? Environment and Planning ‘C’, 30, 448–466. [Google Scholar]
  30. Penning-Rowsell E.C. and Johnson C. (2015). The ebb and flow of power: British flood risk management and the politics of scale. Geoforum, 62, 131–142 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Adaptation Sub-Committee (2012). Climate Change–Is the UK preparing for flooding and water scarcity? London: Committee on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  32. Adaptation Sub-Committee (2015). Progress in preparing for climate change: 2015 Report to Parliament. London: Committee on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.