Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 17, 2017
9th Conference on Interdisciplinary Problems in Environmental Protection and Engineering EKO-DOK 2017
Article Number 00098
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 24 May 2017
  1. M. Lethola, K. Miettinen, M. Keinanen, T. Kekki, O. Laine, A. Hirvonen. Microbiology, chemistry and biofilm development in a pilot drinking water distribution system with copper and plastic pipes. Water Research, 38, strony 3769–3779 (2004) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Simoes, L. Simoes, M. Vieira M., A reviev of current and emergent biofilm control strtegies. Food Science and Technology. 4, 43, 573–583 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Batte, B. Appenzeller, D. Grandjean, S. Fass, V. Gauthier, F. Jorand, L. Mathieu, M. Boualam, S. Saby, J. Block, Biofilms in drinking water distribution systems. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2, 147–168 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Neria-Gonzales, T. Wang, F. Ramirez, J. Romero, C. Hernandez-Rodrigues, Characterization of bacteria community associated to biofilms of corroded oil pipelines from the southeast of Mexico. Anaerobe. 12, 3, 122–133 (2006) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Grabińska-Łoniewska, E. Siński, Mikroorganizmy chorobotwórcze i potencjalnie chorobotwórcze w ekosystemach wodnych i sieciach wodociągowych. Warszawa: Seidel Przywecki (2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Mathieu, C. Bouteleux, S. Fass, E. Angel, J. Block, Reversible shift in the alfa-, beta-, gamma- proteobacteria populations of drinking water biofilms during discontinous chlorination. Water Research, 56, 176–184 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Berry, C. Xi, L. Raskin, Microbial ecologyof drinking water distributions systems. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 17, 297–302 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Nevel, K. Roy, N. Boon, Bacterial invasion potential in water is determined by nutrient availability and the indigenous community. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2013, Tom 85, strony 593–603. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Braun, I. Richert, U. Szewczyk, Detecton of ion- depositing Pedomicrobium in native biofilms from the Odertal NAtional Park by a new, species FISH probe. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 79, strony 37–43 (2009) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Valpi, J. Bridger, FISH glossary: an overview of the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique, BioTechniques, 45, 385–409 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Nielsen, D. Holger, H. Lemmer, I. Arslan-Alaton, T. Olmez-Hanci, FISH Handbook for Biological Wastewater Treatment. Identification and quantification of microorganisms in activated sludge and biofilms by FISH. London, IWA Publishing, 2009. 9781843392316 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Brehm-Stecher, E. Johnson, Single-Cell Microbiology: Tools, Technologies and Applications, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 65, 538–559 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Jetten, L. Niftrik, M. Storus, B. Kartal, J. Keljtjens, Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 44, 65–84 (2009) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Sanz, T. Kochling, Molecuar biology techniques used in wastewater treatment: An overview, Process Biochemistry, 42, 119–133 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M Fazli, T. Bjarnsholt, N. Høiby, M. Givskov, T. Tolker-Nielsen, PNA-Based Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Identification of Bacteria in Clinical Samples, Methods in Molecular Biology, 1211, 261–271 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Liehr, Classification of FISH probes, Part of the series Springer Protocols Handbooks, 43–47 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Boase, J. Jervis-Bardy, E. Cleland, H. Pant, L. Tan, Bacterial-induced epithelial damage promotes fungal biofilm formation in a sheep model of sinusitis, Allergy and Rhinology, 3, 341–348 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Bochner, L. Giovannetti, C. Viti, Important discoveries from analysing bacterial phenotypes, Molecular Microbiology, 70, 274–280 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.