Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 23, 2017
World Renewable Energy Congress-17
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 15
Section 2. Low Energy Architecture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20172302002
Published online 20 November 2017
  1. APPLEYARD, D., GERSON, M. S., LINTELL, M., ÊTATS, U. & FEDERAL HIGHWAY, A. 1976. Liveable urban streets managing auto traffic in neighborhoods : final report : prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration : for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off. [Google Scholar]
  2. GEHL, J. & GEMZØE, L. 1999. Public spaces – public life : Copenhagen 1996, Copenhagen, Danish Architectural Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. GEHL, J. 2006. Life between the buildings : using public space, Copenhagen, Danish Architectural Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. MARSHALL, S. 2005. Streets and patterns : the structure of urban geometry, London : Spon. [Google Scholar]
  5. HILLIER, B. & HANSON, J. 1984. The social logic of space, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. JEON, C. Y., LOKKEN, R. P., HU, F. B. & VAN DAM, R. M. 2007. Physical Activity of Moderate Intensity and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care, 30, 744–752. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LEE, I. M., SHIROMA, E. J., LOBELO, F., PUSKA, P., BLAIR, S. N. & KATZMARZYK, P. T. 2012. Impact of Physical Inactivity on the World’s Major Non-Communicable Diseases. Lancet, 380, 219–229. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2013, Global Action Plan for the Prevention and control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. WHO Press, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  9. TRANSPORT FOR LONDON, L. 2005. Improving Walkability. London, England. [Google Scholar]
  10. LAND TRANSPORT NEW ZEALAND, Z. 2007. Pedestrian Planning and Design Guide. Wellington: New Zealand. [Google Scholar]
  11. EWING, R. & CERVERO, R. 2010. Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265-294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. RYUS, P. 2014. Guidebook on pedestrian and bicycle volume data collection, Washington, DC, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. ZACHARIAS, J., STATHOPOULOS, T. & WU, H. 2004. Spatial Behavior in San Francisco’s Plazas: The Effects of Microclimate, Other People, and Environmental Design. Environment and Behavior, 36, 638-658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. ALJAWABRA, F. & NIKOLOPOULOU, M. 2010. Influence of hot arid climate on the use of outdoor urban spaces and thermal comfort: Do cultural and social backgrounds matter? Intelligent Buildings International, 2, 198–217. [Google Scholar]
  15. NIKOLOPOULOU, M. & STEEMERS, K. 2003. Thermal comfort and psychological adaptation as a guide for designing urban spaces. Energy and Buildings, 35, 95–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. FANGER, P. O. 1982. Thermal comfort : analysis and applications in environmental engineering, Malabar, Fla., R.E. Krieger Pub. Co. [Google Scholar]
  17. NIKOLOPOULOU, M. A. B., NICK AND STEEMERS, KOEN 2001. Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: understanding the human parameter. Solar energy, 70, 227–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. RUPP, R. F., VÁSQUEZ, N. G. & LAMBERTS, R. 2015. A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment. Energy and Buildings, 105, 178–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. WANG, Z. 2006. A field study of the thermal comfort in residential buildings in Harbin. Building and Environment, 41, 1034–1039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. KARJALAINEN, S. 2007. Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments. Building and Environment, 42, 1594–1603. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. KARJALAINEN, S. 2012. Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review. Indoor Air, 22, 96–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TUNG, C.-H., CHEN, C.-P., TSAI, K.-T., KÁNTOR, N., HWANG, R.-L., MATZARAKIS, A. & LIN, T.-P. 2014. Outdoor thermal comfort characteristics in the hot and humid region from a gender perspective. International journal of biometeorology, 58, 1927–1939 %@ 0020-7128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. NUNEZ, M. & OKE, T. R. 1977. The Energy Balance of an Urban Canyon. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 16, 11–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. ALI-TOUDERT, F. & MAYER, H. 2006. Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate. Building and Environment, 41, 94–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. MAYER, H. & HÖPPE, P. 1987. Thermal comfort of man in different urban environments. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 38, 43–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. MAYER, M. 1993. Urban bioclimatology. Experientia, 49, 957. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. HOWARD, L. F. R. S. 1818. The climate of London, deduced from Meteorological observations, made at different places in the neighbourhood of the metropolis, London. [Google Scholar]
  28. TURNER, A. 2007. From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 34, 539–555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  30. H. WICKAM. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  31. KARIMINIA, S., AHMAD, S. S. & SABERI, A. 2015. Microclimatic Conditions of an Urban Square: Role of Built Environment and Geometry. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 718–727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.